See more
Can I sue under the CAN-SPAM Act?
Primary tabs. As a private citizen, unfortunately the answer is no: you don't have any recourse under the CAN-SPAM Act itself. You must rely on the Federal Trade Commission (the "FTC"), your state attorney general, or your internet service provider to police compliance with the CAN-SPAM Act for you.
What is the penalty of CAN-SPAM Act?
Each separate email in violation of the CAN-SPAM Act is subject to penalties of up to $46,517, so non-compliance can be costly. But following the law isn't complicated. Here's a rundown of CAN-SPAM's main requirements: Don't use false or misleading header information.
Is CAN-SPAM enforced?
The CAN-SPAM Act is enforced primarily by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which can seek civil penalties of up to $16,000 per violation (with no maximum penalty).
How do you file a CAN-SPAM complaint?
How to File a CAN-SPAM Complaint with the FTCThe 'File a Complaint' link will take you to: www.ftccomplaintassistant.gov. ... That link launches the FTC Complain Assistant wizard which will guide us through filing a complaint.More items...•
Who enforces CAN-SPAM?
The law requires the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to enforce its provisions. Introduced by Republican Conrad Burns, the act passed both the House and Senate during the 108th United States Congress and was signed into law by President George W. Bush in December of 2003.
CAN-SPAM Act examples?
Under the CAN-SPAM Act, email content falls into three different groups: 1) Commercial content — which advertises or promotes a commercial product or service. Some examples are promotions, sales emails, newsletters, and anything else that has commercial intent.
CAN-SPAM court cases?
The CAN-SPAM Act does not give consumers who have received spam email standing to file a private lawsuit for damages. Instead, private citizens must rely on the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") or state attorneys general to sue on their behalf to recover damages, impose civil penalties, or impose injunctions.
Does CAN-SPAM apply to social media?
It means that if you send an advertising message to individual users through social media sites, you have to fulfill the obligations of the CAN-SPAM Act. This also would apply to automatic, unsolicited messages sent to social media users telling them about content available on a more traditional site.
Is cold emailing illegal Canada?
Canadians are protected (and sanctioned) according to the CASL (Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation). Until July 1st 2017, implied consent was sufficient to be allowed to cold email someone. It isn't anymore.
Can Spam damages?
The act authorizes statutory damages of $250 per violation up to a maximum of $2,000,000 in most cases. In certain cases, courts may triple the damages. Courts may also reduce damages if certain mitigating factors are present. Courts may award reasonable attorneys fees in successful suits.
Why am I suddenly getting a lot of spam emails?
If you start receiving an increased amount of spam, with junk mail filters enabled, then there might be a problem with the mailbox that your spam emails are usually moved to. You should check that the target mailbox or mail folder isn't full or disabled.
Can Spam stands for?
In 2003, Congress enacted the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing ("CAN-SPAM") Act to set a national standard for the regulation of spam email.
Overview
Civil enforcement
In July 2005, the Federal Trade Commission lodged civil CAN-SPAM complaints against nine companies alleging that they were responsible for spam emails that had been sent by them or by their affiliates. Eight of the nine companies, Cyberheat of Tucson, Arizona, APC Entertainment, Inc., of Davie, Florida, MD Media, Inc., of Bingham Farms, Michigan, Pure Marketing Solutions, LLC, of Tampa, Florida, TJ Web Productions, LLC, of Tampa, Florida, and BangBros.com, Inc., RK Netm…
History
The backronym CAN-SPAM derives from the bill's full name: Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography And Marketing Act of 2003. It plays on the word "canning" (putting an end to) spam, as in the usual term for unsolicited email of this type. The bill was sponsored in Congress by Senators Conrad Burns and Ron Wyden.
The CAN-SPAM Act is occasionally referred to by critics as the "You-Can-Spam" Act because th…
The mechanics of CAN-SPAM
CAN-SPAM, a direct response of the growing number of complaints over spam e-mails, defines a "commercial electronic mail message" as "any electronic mail message the primary purpose of which is the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service (including content on an Internet website operated for a commercial purpose)." It exempts "transactional or relationship messages." The FTC issued final rules (16 CFR 316) clarifying the p…
Private right of action
CAN-SPAM provides a limited private right of action to Internet Access Services that have been adversely affected by the receipt of emails that violate the Act; and does not allow natural persons to bring suit. A CAN-SPAM plaintiff must satisfy a higher standard of proof as compared with government agencies enforcing the Act; thus, a private plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant either sent the email at issue or paid another person to send it knowing that the send…
Overriding state anti-spam laws
CAN-SPAM preempts (supersedes) state anti-spam laws that do not deal with false or deceptive activity. The relevant portion of CAN-SPAM reads:
This chapter supersedes any statute, regulation, or rule of a State or political subdivision of a State that expressly regulates the use of electronic mail to send commercial messages, except to the extent that any such statute, regulation, or rule prohibits falsity or deception in any portion o…
CAN-SPAM and the FTC
CAN-SPAM allows the FTC to implement a national do-not-email list similar to the FTC's popular National Do Not Call Registry against telemarketing, or to report back to Congress why the creation of such a list is not currently feasible. The FTC soundly rejected this proposal, and such a list will not be implemented. The FTC concluded that the lack of authentication of email would undermine the list, and it could raise security concerns.
Reaction
Those opposing spam greeted the new law with dismay and disappointment, almost immediately dubbing it the "You Can Spam" Act. Internet activists who work to stop spam stated that the Act would not prevent any spam — in fact, it appeared to give federal approval to the practice, and it was feared that spam would increase as a result of the law. CAUCE (Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email) stated: