How much did the University of Phoenix’s lawsuit settlement pay out?
Lastly, there was no proof for partnering with companies about curriculum, according to the FTC. In 2019, the University of Phoenix lawsuit settlement brought $191 million benefits to debtors. Out of this money, $141 million was loan forgiveness, while the rest, $50 million, was in the form of consumer refunds.
Do I qualify for the University of Phoenix Settlement?
The University of Phoenix settlement has specific eligibility requirements. It brought huge benefits -$141 million debt forgiveness and $50 million cash refunds, but not every debtor qualify for this opportunity. This complete guide will discuss the investigation from start to end and present the eligibility criteria.
How much did Facebook pay to settle discrimination lawsuit?
Under the settlement agreement, Facebook will pay a civil penalty of $4.75 million to the United States, pay up to $9.5 million to eligible victims of Facebook’s alleged discrimination, and train its employees on the anti-discrimination requirements of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b.
What is the settlement agreement?
Under the settlement agreement, the companies will pay a civil penalty to the United States, pay the Charging Party back pay plus interest, and train relevant employees on anti-discrimination obligations.
What is the settlement agreement with Chancery Staffing?
On February 18, 2020, the Division signed a settlement agreement with Chancery Staffing Solutions LLC, aka TransPerfect Staffing Solutions , a legal staffing company headquartered in New York, NY. The Division had previously filed a lawsuit in May 2019 alleging that from at least April 4, 2017 to at least July 7, 2017, the company (while operating as TransPerfect Staffing), had implemented a client directive restricting its recruitment and hiring of attorneys for a document review project to U.S. citizens only, and later, to U.S. citizens without dual citizenship. Under the settlement agreement, Chancery Staffing will pay a civil penalty of $27,000, provide back pay to victims identified during the term of the settlement agreement, and participate in Division-provided training on the anti-discrimination provision contained in 8 U.S.C. § 1324b. Chancery Staffing will also obtain supporting documentation from clients that request a citizenship status restriction when staffing a project to help ensure that any such restriction is lawful.
What is the Facebook lawsuit?
citizens, U.S. nationals, refugees, asylees, and recent lawful permanent residents) in its recruitment and hiring practices, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1). The lawsuit alleges that Facebook routinely refused to recruit, consider, or hire U.S. workers for positions that it reserved for temporary visa holders in connection with the permanent labor certification process (“PERM”). The complaint alleges that beginning no later than January 1, 2018 and lasting until at least September 18, 2019, Facebook used recruiting methods designed to deter U.S. workers from applying to positions reserved for temporary visa holders, refused to consider U.S. workers who applied to the positions, and hired only temporary visa holders for the positions.
What is the complaint against Chancery Staffing Solutions LLC?
On May 9, 2019, the Division filed a complaint with the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer against Chancery Staffing Solutions LLC, a temporary staffing agency, alleging that the company is responsible for a pattern or practice of citizenship status discrimination in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1). Chancery Staffing is the successor to TransPerfect Staffing Solutions LLC and continues to do business as both TransPerfect Staffing Solutions and TransPerfect Legal Solutions. The lawsuit alleges that from at least April 4, 2017, to at least July 7, 2017, TransPerfect Staffing Solutions LLC discriminated against non-U.S. citizens and dual U.S. citizens in staffing a temporary document review project for a client, and that Chancery Staffing Solutions LLC is liable for the discrimination as its successor.
What is the settlement agreement with Adaequare?
(Adaequare) to resolve an independent investigation into whether the company engaged in citizenship or immigration status discrimination in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B). IER’s investigation concluded that the company, which recruits workers for other entities, engaged in discrimination in the hiring or recruitment/referral for a fee processes by considering only applicants who were U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents when filling a job for a client. Under the settlement agreement, the company will pay a civil penalty to the United States, train its employees on anti-discrimination obligations, and be subject to departmental reporting requirements.
What is the settlement agreement with National Systems America?
On January 14, 2021, the Division signed a settlement agreement with National Systems America, LP (NSA) to resolve claims based on its independent investigation into whether the company engaged in discrimination based on citizenship status in the hiring and employment eligibility verification processes in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B) and (a) (6). The company recruits employees using a foreign company as its agent, and directly hires them to perform IT work for NSA clients. IER’s investigation concluded that the company (1) engaged in a pattern or practice of recruiting and hiring only U.S. citizens or U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents for certain positions without legal justification, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B); and (2) on numerous occasions, requested copies of Permanent Resident Cards to confirm the citizenship status and work authorization of candidates who identified themselves as lawful permanent residents during the applicant screening process, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (6). Under the settlement agreement, the company will pay a civil penalty of $34,200 to the United States and train its employees on the requirements of the INA’s anti-discrimination provision, and be subject to departmental reporting requirements.
What was the settlement agreement with Tuscany Hotel and Casino?
On October 10, 2012, the Department of Justice issued a press release announcing a settlement agreement with Tuscany Hotel and Casino resolving a lawsuit alleging the company discriminated against certain non-U.S. citizen s during the employment eligibility verification and reverification processes by requesting those individuals to provide more or different documents or information than required under Form I-9 rules based on their citizenship status. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Tuscany agreed to pay a civil penalty of $49,000 to the government and full back pay to an economic victim. Tuscany will also receive OSC-sponsored training regarding the anti-discrimination provision of the INA, be subject to reporting and monitoring requirements, and will revise its employment eligibility verification procedures.
What is the Ikon settlement agreement?
On December 8, 2020, the Division signed a settlement agreement with Ikon Systems , LLC , resolving claims that Ikon routinely discriminated against U.S. workers (U.S. citizens, U.S. nationals, recent lawful permanent residents , asylees, and refugees) by posting job advertisements specifying a preference for applicants with temporary work visas, and that Ikon failed to consider at least one U.S. citizen applicant who applied to a discriminatory advertisement. Specifically, IER’s investigation found that from at least May 8, 2019, to September 21, 2019, Ikon posted at least eight job advertisements for information technology (“IT”) positions that solicited applications from non-U.S. citizens with immigration statuses associated with certain employment-based visas and, in so doing, harmed U.S. workers by unlawfully deterring or failing to fairly consider them for hire, including the Charging Party. Under the agreement, Ikon will pay a civil penalty of $27,000 to the United States, revise its policies and procedures, train relevant employees and agents on the requirements of the INA’s anti-discrimination provision, and be subject to departmental reporting requirements during the agreement’s two-year term. Separately, Ikon will pay the $15,000 to the Charging Party.
How Are Lawsuit Settlements Paid?
There are several steps you will need to follow in order to get your money. Read all the paperwork carefully.
What Types of Lawsuits are Taxed?
In general, lawsuits that deal with wages are treated as wages. A lawsuit that deals with injuries or damages are not. However, this is not cut and dried, so always speak with a professional to determine how your lawsuit is laid out and how the damages are allocated.
What was the Phoenix University lawsuit settlement?
The news about the long-awaited Phoenix University lawsuit settlement created huge excitement. The monetary sett lement was the highest amount ever requested in a case involving the Federal Trade Commission against a for-profit school. The investigation process was complex and demanded the reveal of many debatable features. However, finally, the parties settled while admitting no wrongdoing. The University of Phoenix settlement has specific eligibility requirements. It brought huge benefits -$141 million debt forgiveness and $50 million cash refunds, but not every debtor qualify for this opportunity.
When did the University of Phoenix settle?
Though the investigation that led to the University of Phoenix settlement started in 2011, it only became a center of media attention during 2012-2014.
Why were These Strategies Problematic?
Most students choose higher education and hence, huge education debt, hoping to get decent jobs after graduation. In the advertising, the university claimed that the graduates had great opportunities , as they partnered with the employers to shape curriculum or hire the students. Therefore, many potential students preferred Phoenix University with the hope of a bright future. If an institution makes such claims, they should be accurate. As mentioned before, the Federal Trade Commission protects consumer rights and ensures consumers are not deceived. When there exists even a tiny doubt about the claims, the FTC steps in the game. For this reason, it should come as no surprise that one of the main causes of the Phoenix University lawsuit was, allegedly, misleading ads.
What were the Claims of the FTC?
In the University of Phoenix lawsuit, the Federal Trade Commission claimed that the companies mentioned in “the Parking Lot” TV ad had no special connections with the university. According to the FTC, these major employers were not creating opportunities specifically for the Phoenix University students. However, it should also be noted that the relation between the university and companies was that the school provided tuition discounts for the employees of these organizations. Another claim by the FTC that led to the University of Phoenix settlement was that the people shown in the ad, together with company logos, worked in those companies even before getting an education in the university. Allegedly, the mentioned special opportunities were open to anyone. Lastly, there was no proof for partnering with companies about curriculum, according to the FTC.
What was Apollo Education Group obliged to provide?
Therefore, Apollo Education Group was obliged to provide the necessary documents and data about Phoenix University’s practices in enrollment, financial aid, tuition fees, debt collection, military recruitment, etc. The FTC wanted to investigate the period from 2011 till the time of the start of the investigation.
What were the talking points at Phoenix University?
One of such talking points mentioned that the students have access to fantastic competitive advantage as it was visible by the alumni hired by industry giants. Another point marked that the students could enjoy exclusive connections provided only to Phoenix University graduates. It was claimed that enrollment advisors convinced the potential students by mentioning that huge companies hire these people because of their education in Phoenix as the companies prefer this school over others.
How much money did Phoenix University receive from the GI Bill?
The associate director of the Center for American Progress mentioned that these documents, especially the ones about military recruitment, had utmost importance because Phoenix University was the top recipient of GI Bill funds- more than $750 million.
