Full Answer
Did CNN pay out $275 million to settle the Sandmann case?
Although it’s true that CNN settled with Sandmann, who had sought $275 million in damages, the details of the settlement were not made public. We sent questions to Sandmann’s attorney and CNN asking for clarification on any potential damages to be paid out to the teen but received no response from either.
Why did CNN pay $76 million in back pay to settle?
Raymond Boyd/Getty Images CNN has agreed to pay $76 million in back pay to settle allegations that it violated federal labor law when it replaced hundreds of unionized broadcast technicians more than 15 years ago, the National Labor Relations Board said Friday.
How much did Biden settle his lawsuit with CNN?
Word that he settled with CNN in January and with the Washington Post last week has raised questions about how much he actually won. Lawyers who have observed the litigation have almost universally agreed it was not anywhere close to $250 million. (The official settlement amount remains confidential.)
Did CNN settle a lawsuit against a student over a viral video?
CNN has settled a lawsuit with a Kentucky high school student who was at the center of a viral video controversy, a spokesperson for the news network confirmed Tuesday. No other details were immediately available.
See 4 key topics from this page & related content
See 5 key topics from this page & related content
See more
How much did CNN pay the board?
Under the terms of the agreement, CNN will pay the $76 million to the board, which will make payments to the affected workers. The payments will compensate them for the protracted length of the case and the tax consequences from the size of the payouts, the union said, adding that it will withdraw all pending charges against CNN.
How long did the CNN contract dispute last?
The agreement ended a 17-year dispute that began when CNN terminated a contract with Team Video Services and replaced the workers with nonunion labor.
What was the settlement with the broadcast technicians?
The National Labor Relations Board said the settlement with unionized broadcast technicians was the largest monetary remedy in its 84-year history. The agreement ended a 17-year dispute that began when CNN terminated a contract with Team Video Services and replaced the workers with nonunion labor.
What did the court remand the board of directors finding for?
The court, however, remanded the board’s joint employer finding for further clarification, along with the issue of back pay for further consideration by the board.
When did CNN terminate its contract?
The agreement ends a long-running dispute that erupted in 2003, when CNN terminated a contract with Team Video Services, which had provided audio and video services to the cable company’s New York and Washington bureaus.
Who accused CNN of waging a long, protracted battle against the workers?
The Communications Workers of America accused CNN of waging such a long, protracted battle against the workers that several of them died before the dispute could be resolved.
Did CNN hire new employees?
CNN then hired new employees to perform the same work without recognizing or bargaining with the two unions that had represented the Team Video Services employees, the board said Friday.
Why did CNN stop the settlement with Sandmann?
In May, the family and CNN stopped that process because Sandmann's birthday was just three months away, which meant the settlement could be confidential.
Who sued CNN?
Why CNN settlement secret. Sandmann sued CNN and other media outlets after a social media firestorm when he was filmed with Native American elder Nathan Phillips in Washington, D.C. A video shows Sandmann and Phillips standing close to each other in a crowd. Sandmann stares at Phillips as Phillips plays a drum.
Why was the Sandmann case released?
But this one was almost released through a Kenton County probate case because, at the time, Sandmann was a minor and couldn't claim the money. Due to COVID-19 court delays, he was able to celebrate his 18th birthday and, no longer a minor, claim the money himself, according to court documents.
What media company did the Sandmann family sue?
In March, the teen sued five more outlets, including Gannett, which is the parent company of The Enquirer. The national interest in the teen began in January 2019 when news outlets reported on a viral video of Sandmann at an incident at the Lincoln Memorial. Since then, his family sued many media companies for defamation, ...
What was the Sandmann lawsuit?
The Sandmann lawsuit against CNN stated: "CNN brought down the full force of its corporate power, influence, and wealth on Nicholas by falsely attacking, vilifying, and bullying him despite the fact that he was a minor child.". In January, CNN settled. Sandmann needed a guardian to claim the settlement for him.
Why was the Sandmann family's claim delayed?
That process was delayed because the COVID-19 pandemic closed in-person hearings. The family had a virtual hearing scheduled. Then, Sandmann's parents and CNN decided to wait for Sandmann's 18th birthday in July to finish ...
Why did CNN settle out of court?
CNN’s desire to avoid discovery, a legal process in which the court may obtain emails and other communications that can act as evidence in the trial, could also be a reason for settling out of court rather than continuing the fight.
What is particularly interesting and mostly overlooked about the CNN case, Glasser said?
What is particularly interesting and mostly overlooked about the CNN case, Glasser said, is the legal arguments it was using to avoid legal repercussions.
What would Sandmann ask for instead of asking for money?
If I were Sandmann, instead of asking for money … my big ask would be an on-air correction and an on-air apology, and, you know, something in the permanent record of the internet, that they would publish a retraction and apologize. I think that’s the equitable thing and that’s the right thing.
What happened to Richard Jewell?
Jewell, who is now the subject of a recently released movie directed by Clint Eastwood, “Richard Jewell,” became the center of a similar media controversy when the Atlanta Journal-Constitution connected him to a bombing at the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta. Jewell was eventually cleared of any wrongdoing.
How much did Nick Sandmann settle for?
Everyone knows Covington Catholic High School’s Nick Sandmann sought $250 million in a lawsuit against major news organizations and individuals within their realms. Word that he settled with CNN in January and with the Washington Post last week has raised questions about how much he actually won. Lawyers who have observed the litigation have almost universally agreed it was not anywhere close to $250 million. (The official settlement amount remains confidential.)
Why did the judge restore Sandman's claims?
In a second order, the judge agreed to restore three of Sandman’s claims because it was still theoretically possible he could prevail if certain evidence was discovered. Those three claims involve statements about blocking Phillips: pic.twitter.com/rgj67oRQQY
What is the weird feature of defamation law?
A weird feature of defamation law is that it frequently rewards willful ignorance and a failure to investigate, at least on these kind of subjective knowledge questions. I don’t think it’s the way the law should be, but it is. You must prove the Post knew.
Did Sandmann go forward with his testimony?
So when Sandmann was given the chance to make document requests and take testimony from the Post and submit himself for testimony, he chose not to go forward.
Did the Sandmann case survive discovery?
The Twitter thread in question posits that though a judge tossed most of Sandmann’s case, the few remaining claims that remained would not have survived discovery. But since the claims were allowed to remain alive, it would have cost $200,000 or so to defend them. That’s why an insurance carrier, in this supposed version of events, probably threw a lowball offer to prevent spending even more to get the entire case tossed. In other words, the settlement was a business decision that had nothing to do with the merits of Sandmann’s case. Here are the legally relevant portions of the thread, with almost all of its twists and turns of defamation litigation included:
Can you recover punitive damages if you prove the post committed malice?
Technically, you could still recover punitive or exemplary damages if you prove The Post committed actual malice, but it’s well understood that actual malice is the kiss of death for a lawsuit, especially in breaking new stories. Zero chance of malice here. — Respectable Lawyer (@RespectableLaw) July 27, 2020.
Is the Washington Post insured?
The Washington Post is insured by a commercial insurance carrier , and I have sued commercial carriers my entire career. They are not settling a case for any significant amount of money without a deposition of the plaintiff.
