According to the terms of the agreement, settlement monies are paid directly to the states (and five U.S. territories). But there is no settlement fund that will give individuals money. The settlement with the tobacco industry does not prevent individuals from filing lawsuits on their own behalf. The Hook
Full Answer
How many States entered into a Master Settlement Agreement with tobacco companies?
[15] On November 23, 1998, the Attorneys General of the remaining 46 states, as well as of the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands, entered into the Master Settlement Agreement with the four largest manufacturers of cigarettes in the United States.
How much did the Master Settlement Agreement cost?
Under the Master Settlement Agreement, seven tobacco companies agreed to change the way they market tobacco products and to pay the states an estimated $206 billion. The tobacco companies also agreed to finance a $1.5 billion anti-smoking campaign, open previously secret industry documents,...
How much did the tobacco companies pay to settle the case?
The tobacco companies also agreed to finance a $1.5 billion anti-smoking campaign, open previously secret industry documents, and disband industry trade groups which Attorneys General maintain conspired to conceal damaging research from the public. To view details of the settlement, select from below:
Are there any tobacco companies that have settled with the MSA?
Eventually, more than 45 tobacco companies settled with the Settling States under the MSA. Although Florida, Minnesota, Mississippi, and Texas are not signatories to the MSA, they have their own individual tobacco settlements, which occurred prior to the MSA.
Where did the tobacco settlement money go?
This year (fiscal year 2020), the states will collect $27.2 billion from the 1998 tobacco settlement and tobacco taxes. But they will spend less than 3% – just $739.7 million – on programs to prevent kids from using tobacco and help smokers quit - less than a quarter (22.4%) of the total funding recommended by the CDC.
What are three results of the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement?
New limits were created for the advertising, marketing and promotion of cigarettes. Tobacco advertising that targets people younger than age 18 was prohibited. Cartoons in cigarette advertising were eliminated. Outdoor, billboard and public transit advertising of cigarettes was eliminated.
What are tobacco settlement payments?
Under the Master Settlement Agreement, seven tobacco companies agreed to change the way they market tobacco products and to pay the states an estimated $206 billion.
Who won the tobacco lawsuit?
In 2006, the American Cancer Society and other plaintiffs won a major court case against Big Tobacco. Judge Gladys Kessler found tobacco companies guilty of lying to the American public about the deadly effects of cigarettes and secondhand smoke.
Can you sue tobacco companies for COPD?
Yes, you can still sue tobacco companies in certain cases. You may be able to bring an action as an individual or, in some cases, as a representative of a class in a class action.
When was the tobacco lawsuit settled?
In 1998, 52 state and territory attorneys general signed the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) with the four largest tobacco companies in the U.S. to settle dozens of state lawsuits brought to recover billions of dollars in health care costs associated with treating smoking-related illnesses.
How long did tobacco litigation last?
In the forty years through 1994, over 800 private claims were brought against tobacco companies in state courts across the country.
What is MSA reporting for tobacco?
MSA Multicat Mandatory Data Multicat reports are weekly reports filed electronically by tobacco, candy, drinks, and grocery distributors to report sales and inventory floor counts to brand manufacturers as part of participating in their trade programs.
How does the tobacco settlement money help disease prevention and health promotion?
The American Lung Association believes that states must use these tobacco settlement dollars, which are intended to compensate states for the healthcare costs from treating sick smokers and former smokers, and revenue from tobacco taxes to fund robust tobacco prevention programs to help tackle the #1 preventable cause ...
What did the master settlement agreement do?
It requires the tobacco industry to pay the settling states billions of dollars annually forever, forbids participating cigarette manufacturers from targeting youth, imposes restrictions on advertising and promotional activities, and bans or restricts transit advertising, outdoor advertising, product placement in media ...
Did tobacco companies lie?
In 2006, the US District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that tobacco companies were guilty of breaking civil racketeering laws, marketing to children and minority populations, and lying to the public about the dangers of smoking.
What did tobacco companies get sued for?
The United States Justice Department has filed a massive civil lawsuit against the country's major tobacco companies, seeking to recover billions of dollars in long term costs related to treating ill smokers covered by the government health programmes.
What effect did the tobacco settlement have on tobacco sold in the US?
Revenues from domestic sales of tobacco products increased after the MSA was reached, and profits from this source increased as well. Although overall domestic consumption of cigarettes decreased,22 the cigarette price increases more than offset such declines.
Which of the following was a result of the 1998 settlement between the tobacco industry and US states?
The settlement included a payment by the companies of $365.5 billion, agreement to possible Food and Drug Administration regulation under certain circumstances, and stronger warning labels and restrictions on advertising.
What is MSA reporting for tobacco?
MSA Multicat Mandatory Data Multicat reports are weekly reports filed electronically by tobacco, candy, drinks, and grocery distributors to report sales and inventory floor counts to brand manufacturers as part of participating in their trade programs.
How tobacco settlement money helps Disease Prevention and health Promotion?
The American Lung Association believes that states must use these tobacco settlement dollars, which are intended to compensate states for the healthcare costs from treating sick smokers and former smokers, and revenue from tobacco taxes to fund robust tobacco prevention programs to help tackle the #1 preventable cause ...
How many tobacco companies have settled under the MSA?
Eventually, more than 45 tobacco companies settled with the Settling States under the MSA. Although Florida, Minnesota, Mississippi, and Texas are not signatories to the MSA, they have their own individual tobacco settlements, which occurred prior to the MSA.
What is the prohibition on tobacco companies?
Prohibiting tobacco companies from taking any action to target youth in the advertising, promotion or marketing of tobacco products.
What is the NAAG Center for Tobacco and Public Health?
The NAAG Center for Tobacco and Public Health works with the Settling States of the MSA to preserve and enforce the MSA’s monetary and public-health mandates, including: Representing, advising, and supporting the Settling States in MSA-related legal matters , including litigation and arbitrations.
How does MSA work?
The MSA’s purpose is to reduce smoking in the U.S., especially in youth, which is achieved through: 1 Raising the cost of cigarettes by imposing payment obligations on the tobacco companies party to the MSA. 2 Restricting tobacco advertising, marketing, and promotions, including:#N#Prohibiting tobacco companies from taking any action to target youth in the advertising, promotion or marketing of tobacco products.#N#Banning the use of cartoons in advertising, promotions, packaging, or labeling of tobacco products.#N#Prohibiting tobacco companies from distributing merchandise bearing the brand name of tobacco products.#N#Banning payments to promote tobacco products in media, such as movies, televisions shows, theater, music, and video games.#N#Prohibiting tobacco brand name sponsorship of events with a significant youth audience or team sports. 3 Eliminating tobacco company practices that obscure tobacco’s health risks. 4 Providing money for the Settling States that states may choose to use to fund smoking prevention programs. 5 Establishing and funding the Truth Initiative, an organization “dedicated to achieving a culture where all youth and young adults reject tobacco.”
What law gave the FDA the power to regulate tobacco products?
In 2009, the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act gave the FDA the power to regulate tobacco products. State attorneys general have been active participants in helping the FDA shape its regulatory authority.
How does the MSA affect smoking?
The MSA continues to have a profound effect on smoking in America, particularly among youth. Between 1998 and 2019 , U.S. cigarette consumption dropped by more than 50%. During that same time period, regular smoking by high schoolers dropped from its near peak of 36.4% in 1997 to a low 6.0% in 2019. As advocates for the public interest, state attorneys general are actively and successfully continuing to enforce the provisions of the MSA to reduce tobacco use and protect consumers.
What is the purpose of entering into agreements with major retail chains?
Entering into agreements with major retail chains to ensure that retailers comply with state laws setting the minimum age at which tobacco products may be purchased and limiting the quantity and content of tobacco advertising at retail locations.
What is the tobacco master settlement agreement?
The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement ( MSA) was entered in November 1998, originally between the four largest United States tobacco companies ( Philip Morris Inc., R. J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson and Lorillard – the "original participating manufacturers", referred to as the "Majors") and the attorneys general of 46 states. The states settled their Medicaid lawsuits against the tobacco industry for recovery of their tobacco-related health-care costs. In exchange, the companies agreed to curtail or cease certain tobacco marketing practices, as well as to pay, in perpetuity, various annual payments to the states to compensate them for some of the medical costs of caring for persons with smoking-related illnesses. The money also funds a new anti-smoking advocacy group, called the Truth Initiative, that is responsible for such campaigns as Truth and maintains a public archive of documents resulting from the cases.
When was the Master Settlement Agreement signed?
Adoption of the "Master Settlement Agreement". In November 1998 , the Attorneys General of the remaining 46 states, as well as of the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands, entered into the Master Settlement Agreement with the four largest manufacturers of cigarettes in the United States.
Why did the OPMs and the settling states not join the MSA?
The OPMs worried that the NPMs, both because they would not be bound by the advertising and other restrictions in the MSA and because they would not be required to make payments to the settling states, would be able to charge lower prices for their cigarettes and thus increase their market share.
How long does it take for a SPM to join the Master Settlement Agreement?
As an incentive to join the Master Settlement Agreement, the agreement provides that, if an SPM joined within ninety days following the Master Settlement Agreement's "Execution Date," that SPM is exempt ("exempt SPM") from making annual payments to the settling states unless the SPM increases its share of the national cigarette market beyond its 1998 market share, or beyond 125% of that SPM's 1997 market share. If the exempt SPM's market share in a given year increases beyond those relevant historic limits, the MSA requires that the exempt SPM make annual payments to the settling states, similar to those made by the OPMs, but based only upon the SPM's sales representing the exempt SPM's market share increase.
What was the 1997 National Settlement Proposal?
This proposed congressional remedy (1997 National Settlement Proposal (NSP), a.k.a. the "June 20, 1997 Proposal") for the cigarette tobacco problem resembled the eventual Multistate Settlement Agreement (MSA), but with important differences. For example, although the congressional proposal would have earmarked one-third of all funds to combat teenage smoking, no such restrictions appear in the MSA. In addition, the congressional proposal would have mandated Food and Drug Administration oversight and imposed federal advertising restrictions. It also would have granted immunity from state prosecutions; eliminated punitive damages in individual tort suits; and prohibited the use of class actions, or other joinder or aggregation devices without the defendant's consent, assuring that only individual actions could be brought. The congressional proposal called for payments to the states of $368.5 billion over 25 years. By contrast, assuming that the Majors would maintain their market share, the MSA provides baseline payments of about $200 billion over 25 years. This baseline payment is subject to
How many plaintiffs have ever prevailed in the tobacco case?
Only two plaintiffs ever prevailed, and both of those decisions were reversed on appeal. As scientific evidence mounted in the 1980s, tobacco companies claimed contributory negligence as they asserted adverse health effects were previously unknown or lacked substantial credibility.
How many lawsuits were filed against tobacco companies?
By the mid-1950s, individuals in the United States began to sue the companies responsible for manufacturing and marketing cigarettes for damages related to the effects of smoking. In the forty years through 1994, over 800 private claims were brought against tobacco companies in state courts across the country. The individuals asserted claims for negligent manufacture, negligent advertising, fraud, and violation of various state consumer protection statutes. The tobacco companies were successful against these lawsuits. Only two plaintiffs ever prevailed, and both of those decisions were reversed on appeal. As scientific evidence mounted in the 1980s, tobacco companies claimed contributory negligence as they asserted adverse health effects were previously unknown or lacked substantial credibility.
What is the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement?
The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement simultaneously represents one of the most egregious examples of a government shakedown of private industry and offers a case study of the problems that stem from big government and big business scratching each other’s backs. It has turned the largest tobacco companies into an indispensable cash cow for politicians and bureaucrats, enabled irresponsible state spending, and, amazingly, has resulted in less money for public health and tobacco control while propping up a declining industry. As is the case with discriminatory tobacco taxes, the incentives of the MSA are perverse: the more people smoke, the more money the government gets to spend on whatever it wants. The biggest losers are those with tobacco-related diseases and smokers trying to quit.
What was the master settlement agreement between the tobacco companies and the states?
In November 1998, forty-six US states, along with the District of Columbia and five US territories, and the major tobacco companies entered into a contract of an extraordinary nature. (The other four states, Florida, Minnesota, Mississippi, and Texas, had entered similar agreements on their own beginning the year before.) The agreement, known as the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA), represented the culmination of a decades-long argument between the tobacco companies and state governments. After the dangers of smoking became known, the tobacco industry had engaged in extensive efforts to somehow stay in business, deflect and defeat lawsuits, and minimize negative attention. Public healthcare systems—and most of the healthcare in this country is taxpayer-funded or subsidized—had seen an influx of patients with smoking-related diseases, and state governments began filing lawsuits against the tobacco companies, claiming they wanted money to help cover smoking-related healthcare costs. The tobacco companies had lots of money but were nervous about the states’ potential to sue them out of business. So, they decided to talk. The result was the MSA.
How do politicians take advantage of the tobacco industry?
Besides politicians’ quintessential habit of spending money on things it was not meant for, there is a more insidious way that they have taken advantage of the never-ending stream of money from the tobacco companies. This is called securitization, and it occurs when a cash-strapped state borrows against promised future MSA payments so that it can get the money immediately. The state issues bonds backed up by the promise of future payments. The term “tobacco bonds” is a reference to this irresponsible practice. The buyers of bonds (the most prominent of which are powerful financial institutions) make a handsome long-term profit. State governments and their taxpayers get a raw deal. As the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids warned as early as 2002, states that securitize their tobacco funds get much smaller total payments, “usually for about 40 cents on the dollar or less,” than they would if they let the future revenue come in as planned. Borrowing against future payments in exchange for less money today leads to fewer resources for public health and more money for Wall Street. Yet politicians openly turn to the MSA revenue to cover for their irresponsible spending. For example, in November 2017, as Pennsylvania tried to balance its budget shortfall that had been caused by a refusal to eliminate wasteful spending, securitizing tobacco settlement revenue was the preferred course of all parties. Unfortunately, even some otherwise fiscally responsible politicians like to securitize tobacco revenue, as they consider it a better option than raising taxes.
How does the amount paid by tobacco companies affect the number of cigarettes sold?
The amount paid by the tobacco companies would directly correlate to the number of cigarettes sold—the more cigarettes sold, the more money the states would get. In exchange for their money, the tobacco companies would not be sued by state and local governments seeking recovery of costs associated with tobacco use.
How much money did tobacco companies pay to the states?
Nearly twenty years later, the tobacco companies have paid a staggering $119.5 billion to the states and territories participating in the MSA and another $25.4 billion to the four states with their own agreements. What have the states done with this huge amount of money?
What is tobacco bonds?
The state issues bonds backed up by the promise of future payments. The term “tobacco bonds” is a reference to this irresponsible practice. The buyers of bonds (the most prominent of which are powerful financial institutions) make a handsome long-term profit. State governments and their taxpayers get a raw deal.
What are the incentives of the MSA?
As is the case with discriminatory tobacco taxes, the incentives of the MSA are perverse: the more people smoke, the more money the government gets to spend on whatever it wants. The biggest losers are those with tobacco-related diseases and smokers trying to quit.
What is the Master Settlement Agreement?
The Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) imposes major restrictions on tobacco company marketing practices and prohibits advertising aimed at youth. The MSA restricts the participating tobacco companies in the following ways: Prohibits direct or indirect targeting of youth in advertising, marketing and promotions.
Who represented California in the tobacco litigation?
The Attorney General represented the State of California in the tobacco litigation. The Attorney General established the first full-time state tobacco enforcement unit in the country and provided consumers with a complaint line, 916-565-6486, for reporting suspected violations of the MSA.
Where do the tobacco protection funds go?
The payments go directly from smokers’ pockets to the State treasuries after being “laundered” through the tobacco companies that were basically forced to pay “protection money” to the Mob or face the consequences. I’m pretty sure there are no provisions for individual citizens to touch the funds in any State, though I’d be interested in knowing about it if I’m wrong.
How long does it take to file a claim against a tobacco company?
You file a claim against the tobacco Co. If they don't answer or respond within 30 days, it becomes law.
Why do people quit smoking?
And they’ve done it without “hitting bottom” through jail, horrible accidents, killing people in fights, overdosing, extreme medical consequences, or waking up in the gutter — usually quitting just because of social pressure, relatively mild financial expenditure (at least when compared to most illegal drugs), or concerns about far future possibilities of health consequences.
Where does MSA money go?
In most States (49 of them in fact) the MSA funds go directly to the State, and are used for whatever purpose they wish. In theory the money is for treating ill smokers and funding local tobacco control - but as often as not it goes into whatever they have a current financial problem with, such as funding the State employee pensions. Indeed, the impression is that less than 2% of the MSA funds, overall, are assigned to their original purpose.
Can smokers sue a cigarette manufacturer?
In States that did not sign up to the Master Settlement Agreement, individual smokers (or their surviving families or estates) have successfully sued a cigarette manufacturer, sometimes as individuals and sometimes in a class action. Recent cases include Florida’s Robinson/RJR case, which resolved to a $17m award. Florida has several cases outstanding, more on that here: Tobacco giants settle smoking lawsuits for $100M. Some of these cases can be found by searching ‘tallahassee tobacco suit’ and similar.
Can smokers sue a CI?
In States that did not sign up to the Master Settlement Agreement, individual smokers (or their surviving families or estates) have successfully sued a ci
Can you settle a tobacco dispute?
You can’t. The Master Settlement Agreement was a deal between the tobacco companies and the states, settling litigation by the states.
Overview
The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) was entered on November 23, 1998, originally between the four largest United States tobacco companies (Philip Morris Inc., R. J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson and Lorillard – the "original participating manufacturers", referred to as the "Majors") and the attorneys general of 46 states. The states settled their Medicaid lawsuits against the tobacco industry for recovery of their tobacco-related health-care costs. In exchange, the compa…
History of adoption
In September 1950, an article was published in the British Medical Journal linking smoking to lung cancer and heart disease. In 1954 the British Doctors Study confirmed the suggestion, based on which the government issued advice that smoking and lung cancer rates were related. In 1964 the United States Surgeon General's Report on Smoking and Health likewise began suggesting the relatio…
Summary of terms
The Original Participating Manufacturers (OPMs) agreed to several broad categories of conditions:
• to restrict their advertising, sponsorship, lobbying, and litigation activities, particularly as those activities were seen as targeting youth;
• to disband three specific "Tobacco-Related Organizations," and to restrict their creation and participation in trade associations;
Contraband statutes
By the middle of 2000, domestic NPMs and importers had begun to obtain greater market share. The NAAG noted that reductions in settlement payments which result from an overall reduction in cigarette consumption benefit the states because health care costs imposed by each cigarette exceed the settlement payments. On the other hand, when reductions in settlement payments occur because NPM sales displace PM sales, the states receive no benefits if the NPMs do not …
Criticism
Some anti-smoking advocates, such as William Godshall, have criticized the MSA as being too lenient on the major tobacco companies. In a speech at the National Tobacco Control Conference, Godshall stated that "[w]ith unprecedented future legal protection granted by the state A.G.s in exchange for money, it appears that the tobacco industry has emerged from the state lawsuits even more powerful".
Securitization
In the ten years following the settlement, many state and local governments have opted to sell so-called Tobacco Bonds. They are a form of securitization. In many cases the bonds permit state and local governments to transfer the risk of declines in future master settlement agreement payments to bondholders. In some cases, however, the bonds are backed by secondary pledges of state or local revenues, which creates what some see as a perverse incentive to support the to…
Individual state settlements
There is technically a distinct MSA signed separately with each state. While these MSAs are identical, the states have had to enact enabling legislation which differs from state to state. Furthermore, each state's court system is entitled to create its own jurisdictional interpretations of the MSA text. As a result, legal understanding of the MSA differ from state to state.
Documents relating to the initial lawsuits filed by each individual state are available at the UCSF
See also
• Operation Berkshire
• Project SCUM
• Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation
• "Truth" ad campaign