Settlement FAQs

is a settlement agreement a communication under the fdcpa

by Prof. Lucius Russel IV Published 2 years ago Updated 2 years ago

On November 18, 2016, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the communication of an unequivocal and non-coercive settlement offer does not violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (the “FDCPA”). Vazquez v.

Full Answer

What is “communication” under the FDCPA?

Under the FDCPA, “communication” is defined as “the conveying of information regarding a debt directly or indirectly to any person through any medium.” The Sixth Circuit noted that, “ [t]o convey information regarding a debt, a communication must at a minimum imply the existence of a debt.”

What is the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)?

Safeguard Prop., LLC, a property preservation company was sued by a borrower under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). After the borrower had been in default, the property preservation company was directed by the lender to inspect the property and to leave a door hanger that requested the borrower to contact the lender.

What are my rights under the fdfcpa?

List of your FDFCPA Rights. Under the FDCPA, if a debt collector does any of the restricted activities listed below it is considered a FDCPA violation. It is a FDCPA violation to make misleading or false representation through a phone call, email, voice mail or letter. Misleading information or FDCPA violations can include.

Does a voicemail constitute a communication under the FDCPA?

The lower court ruled that the voicemail did not constitute a “communication” as defined by the FDCPA because the message did not "imply the existence of a debt." Brown appealed. The Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision to grant Van Ru’s motion.

See more

What is a communication under the FDCPA?

The FDCPA defines “communication” as “the conveying of information regarding a debt directly or indirectly to any person through any medium.” 15 U.S.C.

What are four practices that collectors are prohibited from doing under the FDCPA?

They cannot swear, threaten to illegally harm you or your property, threaten you with illegal actions, or falsely threaten you with actions they do not intend to take. They also cannot make repeated calls over a short period to annoy or harass you.

What is not covered by FDCPA?

The FDCPA applies only to the collection of debt incurred by a consumer primarily for personal, family, or household purposes. It does not apply to the collection of corporate debt or to debt owed for business or agricultural purposes.

What constitutes meaningful disclosure under the FDCPA?

Second, the Eleventh Circuit determined the novel issue of what constitutes a “meaningful disclosure” under the FDCPA by ruling that an individual caller is not required to disclose his/her identity as long the caller discloses that the call is being made on behalf of a debt collection company and the debtor collection ...

What type of communication is prohibited in collection attempts?

The FDCPA forbids harassing, oppressive, and abusive conduct—no matter what kind of communication media the debt collector uses. So, this prohibition applies to in-person interactions, telephone calls, audio recordings, paper documents, mail, email, text messages, social media, and other electronic media.

What is the most common violation of the FDCPA?

Harassment of the debtor by the creditor – More than 40 percent of all reported FDCPA violations involved incessant phone calls in an attempt to harass the debtor.

What is allowed and not allowed according to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act FDCPA?

Debt collectors must be truthful The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act states that debt collectors cannot use any false, deceptive or misleading representation to collect the debt. Along with other restrictions, debt collectors cannot misrepresent: The amount of the debt. Whether it's past the statute of limitations.

What are the specifically forbidden practices under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act FDCPA )?

The law makes it illegal for debt collectors to harass debtors in other ways, including threats of bodily harm or arrest. They also cannot lie or use profane or obscene language. Additionally, debt collectors cannot threaten to sue a debtor unless they truly intend to take that debtor to court.

Does FDCPA apply first party collections?

While the proposed rule raised concerns as to whether first-party creditors were in scope, the final version of the Rule expressly states it applies only to “debt collectors” as that term is defined in the FDCPA.

What is initial communication?

Initial Communication means a written communication of any form of letter/e-mail that discloses or demonstrates information that may evidence unethical or improper activity.

What type of communication is limited content message?

Under the CFPB's Debt Collection Rule, a “limited-content message” is a voicemail message left by a debt collector that must contain required information and may contain other optional information.

Is a limited content message a communication?

(b) Attempt to communicate means any act to initiate a communication or other contact about a debt with any person through any medium, including by soliciting a response from such person. An attempt to communicate includes leaving a limited-content message, as defined in paragraph (j) of this section.

What is allowed and not allowed according to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act FDCPA?

Debt collectors must be truthful The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act states that debt collectors cannot use any false, deceptive or misleading representation to collect the debt. Along with other restrictions, debt collectors cannot misrepresent: The amount of the debt. Whether it's past the statute of limitations.

What are the specifically forbidden practices under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act FDCPA )?

The law makes it illegal for debt collectors to harass debtors in other ways, including threats of bodily harm or arrest. They also cannot lie or use profane or obscene language. Additionally, debt collectors cannot threaten to sue a debtor unless they truly intend to take that debtor to court.

What is the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act quizlet?

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act was established to protect the consumer and set guidelines by which credit collectors must abide.

What constitutes a false and misleading debt collection practice?

(1) The false representation or implication that the debt collector is vouched for, bonded by, or affiliated with the United States or any State, including the use of any badge, uniform, or facsimile thereof. (2) The false representation of -- (A) the character, amount, or legal status of any debt; or.

What is the meaning of communication in the FDCPA?

Under the FDCPA, “communication” is defined as “the conveying of information regarding a debt directly or indirectly to any person through any medium.”. The Sixth Circuit noted that, “ [t]o convey information regarding a debt, a communication must at a minimum imply the existence of a debt.”.

Is the FDCPA a non binding commentary?

The opinion goes on to explain that this interpretation of “communication” is consistent with legislative intent as well as the non-binding commentary of the Federal Trade Commission, as well as the decisions of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (the only other circuit to consider the issue) regarding the FDCPA.

Is there a fine line between a lawful and an unlawful communication by a debt collector?

In a recent opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld a lower court ruling that a debt collector, Van Ru Credit Corporation, did not cross the line when it left a voicemail message with a debtor’s business.

Did the debt collector win the case?

While the courts ruled in favor of the debt collector in this case, it illustrates nonetheless the risks parties face when attempting to collect a debt. While the debt collector in this case “won,” it still lost in the sense that it likely spent significant time and resources defending against a claim based on a seemingly innocuous voicemail communication. It’s important that debt collectors understand and thoroughly train their staff on what to say, and not to say, when communicating regarding debts.

What is the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act?

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) is designed to protect debtors and prevent collection agencies from using deceptive or abusive tactics in their attempts to collect on debts. Let’s take a closer look.

How long does a collection agency have to provide a debt validation letter?

Under the FDCPA, the collection agency must provide this information within thirty days of the debtor receiving the initial debt validation letter if it seeks to legally pursue debt repayment. If the collection agency cannot provide this information, it cannot legally continue to call a debtor.

How long does it take for a collection agency to notify a debtor?

Within five days of initial contact, a collection agency is legally required to notify a debtor in a written debt validation letter of the right to dispute the debt. Additionally, the debtor is entitled to verify the debt – to request the name and address of the original creditor, along with the amount owed.

Does the FDCPA prohibit debt collectors from using false or misleading statements?

The FDCPA prohibits debt collectors from using any false or misleading statements in attempts to recover delinquent debts. Debt collectors must be truthful regarding the amount of debt – and whether it is beyond the statute of limitations for the state in which you reside – it could be that you don’t owe anything at all!

Can a debt collector call a debt collector?

Additionally, debt collectors cannot call to collect debt without first identifying themselves as collectors. As a general rule, it is a good idea to keep a written record of all communications with debt collectors, including the date, time and substance of all phone conversations.

Can a debt collector speak to a lawyer?

If you’re represented by an attorney, the FDCPA mandates that debt collectors communicate with the attorney, not you. Debt collectors are also prohibited from speaking with third parties regarding your debt – this includes your employer, family members, neighbors and friends.

Can debt collectors seize property?

They also cannot seek to solicit more than is owed on a debt by attaching additional fees. They cannot seize or threaten to seize property if a legal judgment has not been issued. Debt collectors are also prohibited from soliciting post-dated checks in an attempt to coerce payment.

What is a FDCPA violation?

It is a FDCPA violation to make misleading or false representation through a phone call, email, voice mail or letter. Misleading information or FDCPA violations can include. Threatening to sue or pursue any type of legal action, damage your credit rating, impose any type of property repossession, or wage garnishment which ...

What happens if a collection agency calls an individual at work?

If the collection agency calls an individual at work they may not notify an employer of the reason for the call before being asked.

What is inappropriate time for a debt collector?

Calling on multiple occasions at inappropriate times. The FDCPA defines inappropriate times as any contact after 9:00 PM or before 8:00 AM.

Does publishing names of people fail to pay their debts include giving the information to a credit reporting agency?

Publishing the names of the people who fail to pay their debts. This does not include giving the information to a credit reporting agency.

How long is the statute of limitations on a FDCPA lawsuit?

The law firm moved to dismiss the lawsuit as being time barred by the FDCPA’s one-year statute of limitations period. The law firm argued that the limitations period runs from the date of the alleged FDCPA violation (i.e., the 2009 judgment) and not from the date the violation is alleged to have been discovered (i.e., in 2014). The 3rd Circuit, recognizing a split in authority with the 4th and 9th Circuits, ruled that the FDCPA’s statute of limitations runs from the date the alleged violation occurred. In this case, that was in 2009 when the law firm obtained the default judgment and not in 2014 when the borrower discovered the alleged FDCPA violation.

Which circuit ruled that nonjudicial foreclosures are not covered by the FDCPA?

Recognizing a split among the federal circuits, the 10th Circuit ruled that nonjudicial foreclosures are not covered by the FDCPA and that the law firm was not obligated to respond to the borrower’s debt validation request.

What happens after a borrower defaults on a loan?

After the borrower had been in default, the property preservation company was directed by the lender to inspect the property and to leave a door hanger that requested the borrower to contact the lender. On these facts, the borrower sued the preservation company.

Why did the debtor sue the debt collector?

On these facts, the debtor sued the debt collector under the FDCPA alleging that the debt collector failed to “reasonably” investigate the information the debtor disputed because the debt collector did not separately contact and confirm the account information with the creditor.

What is a debt collector notice in Wisconsin?

The debt collector’s notice indicated that the Wisconsin borrower may be liable for “late charges and other charges.”. The borrower sued the debt collector under the FDCPA asserting that the “late charges and other charges” language in the notice violated the statute.

How did the law firm initiate the foreclosure?

The law firm initiated the foreclosure by sending the borrower a notice stating its intent to foreclose, details about the debt and a disclosure that the law firm may be considered a debt collector attempting to collect a debt. The borrower responded and disputed the debt. The law firm did not respond and proceeded to foreclose.

Which case split the Federal Circuits?

The Federal Circuits Split on if the FDCPA Applied to Nonjudicial Foreclosures — Obduskey v. Wells Fargo, 879 F.3d 1216 (10th Cir. 2018)

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9