In the reviewed literature, researchers raise a problem of poor functioning of WTO dispute settling programs which makes developing countries vulnerable. Vulnerability of trade partners in its turn projects additional risks on KSA (Salamah, 2016).
Full Answer
What is the problem with the WTO?
The particular issue is economic dispute settling mechanism that WTO considers to be functioning flawlessly but in fact generates no profit for developing countries that have only a nominal access to it. That brings up an issue of underrepresentation of such countries in the system of WTO dispute settlement.
Do developed countries make a disproportionate use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System?
Taking account of the fact that the majority of WTO Members are developing countries, one could conclude that the developed countries make a disproportionate use of the dispute settlement system.
When does a country withdraw a trade barrier from the WTO?
If such a trade barrier undermines the export opportunities of the developing country and is found to be inconsistent with the WTO, its withdrawal may not occur until two or three years after the filing of a WTO dispute settlement complaint.
What is a complex WTO dispute?
Complex disputes translate to more stages making the WTO litigation costly in terms of money and time, particularly for developing countries. For this reason, the new DSM was established to eliminate inefficiencies and unfairness in dispute resolution.
See more
Is WTO dispute settlement system biased against developing countries?
Although such system should encourage more participation by developing countries and establish harmonized and equitable relationships between member states, the DS procedure seems to show a bias against developing countries.
How the WTO affects developing countries?
All WTO agreements contain special provisions for developing countries, including longer periods to implement agreements and commitments, measures to increase their trading opportunities and support to help them build the infrastructure for WTO work, handle disputes, and implement technical standards.
What are the major issues in settlement of international trade disputes?
List of Key Issues involved in Settlement of International Trade Disputes:Applicable Substantive Law:Jurisdiction or Forum:Venue of Arbitration:Applicable Procedural Law:Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgements and Arbitral Awards:
Why do developing countries criticize WTO?
Yet several criticisms of the WTO have arisen over time from a range of fields, including economists such as Dani Rodrik and Ha Joon Chang, and anthropologists such as Marc Edelman, who have argued that the institution "only serves the interests of multinational corporations, undermines local development, penalizes ...
What are the problems of developing countries with regard to world trade?
The developing countries are facing the problem of mounting growth of its developmental imports which include various types of machineries and equipment's for the development of various types of industries as well as a huge growth of maintenance imports for collecting intermediate goods and raw materials required for ...
What are the negative impacts of WTO?
Negative impacts: CAM ( Competitive Agriculture Markets)did not have a positive impact as it benefited the MNC giants to dominate the trade market. Due to the low price of imports in the Indian market, the crop producers suffered a heavy loss. There is still a lack of transparency in WTO regarding the developed nations.
What are the major issues between developed and developing nations in WTO?
The differences can be found in subjects of immense importance to developing countries, such as agriculture. This is a summary of some of the points discussed in the WTO....Some issues raisedStandards and safety.Services.Anti-dumping, subsidies etc.Non-tariff barriers.Plurilaterals.
Is the WTO dispute settlement system effective?
If one compares the WTO dispute settlement system with the previous dispute settlement system of GATT 1947, the current system has been far more effective. Moreover, its quasi-judicial and quasi-automatic character enables it to handle more difficult cases.
What are the objectives of dispute settlement body of the WTO?
A central objective of the (WTO) dispute settlement system is to provide security and predictability to the multilateral trading system (Article 3.2 of the DSU).
What are three main criticisms of WTO?
ContentsThe WTO only serves the interests of multinational corporations.The WTO is a stacked court.The WTO tramples over labor and human rights.The WTO is destroying the environment.The WTO is killing people.The US adoption of the WTO was undemocratic.The WTO undermines local development and penalizes poor countries.More items...
How the developing countries which are the members of the WTO suffer due to trade barriers?
The developing countries suffer due to trade barriers. WTO is supposed to allow free trade for all in practice. But the developed countries have unfairly retained trade barriers. i WTO rules have forced the developing countries to remove trade barriers.
Which of the following is one of the main criticisms against the WTO?
Which of the following is one of the main criticisms against the WTO? Criticism against the WTO has largely come from the right, who charge that the WTO is antidemocratic because decisions are made behind closed doors in the interest of large corporations rather than the poor.
How has the WTO failed developing countries?
Agricultural subsidies: beyond cotton, WTO members have failed even to agree how to reduce the huge subsidies paid to rich world farmers, whose overproduction continues to threaten the livelihoods of developing world farmers.
What are the advantages of WTO membership to developing countries?
The WTO aspires for free trade by binding its Members with international commitments in terms of access to the goods and services markets, the use of economic policy instruments affecting trade, and the state support of agriculture.
What are the impact of WTO?
The WTO's global system lowers trade barriers through negotiation and operates under the principle of non-discrimination. The result is reduced costs of production (because imports used in production are cheaper), reduced prices of finished goods and services, more choice and ultimately a lower cost of living.
Why do developing countries join the WTO?
Least-developed countries: special focus The least-developed countries receive extra attention in the WTO. All the WTO agreements recognize that they must benefit from the greatest possible flexibility, and better-off members must make extra efforts to lower import barriers on least- developed countries' exports.
When was the WTO established?
It is separate and independent from the WTO. It was established by an international agreement signed by 29 Members of the WTO in Seattle on 1 December 1999, the “Agreement Establishing the Advisory Centre on WTO Law”.
How many members are there in the WTO?
There are currently some 30 members. Every WTO Member, whether a developing country or not, as well as countries and independent customs territories in the process of accession to the WTO, can become members of the Advisory Centre. The Advisory Centre functions essentially as a law office specialized in WTO law.
What is the WTO dispute settlement mechanism?
The World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM) evolved from the ineffective mechanism used under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) to settle trade-related disagreements among member states (WTO 2015a; Read 2005, p. 1). Under the GATT mechanism, procedures were not only costly but also time consuming because the disputing parties could delay or block stages of the dispute resolution process. The fundamental steps of dispute resolution addressed in the mechanism include consultation, mediation, conciliation and remedies among others (Böhmelt & Spilker 2013, p. 8). Complex disputes translate to more stages making the WTO litigation costly in terms of money and time, particularly for developing countries. For this reason, the new DSM was established to eliminate inefficiencies and unfairness in dispute resolution. Given that the DSM has been in operation for several years, it is possible to make a tentative investigation of the impact of the mechanism within the international trading system. Several cases have been addressed through the DSM. These include complaints against developed countries and international trade unions like the United States and the EU respectively. The dispute settlement procedures had targeted countries at different levels of development, including the U.S. and the EU states at one edge and India and Pakistan at the other edge of the development spectrum. Developing countries suffered most due to lack of political and economic influence in the international arena (Busch & Reinhardt 2004, p. 6). This paper describes the role of the WTO with emphasis on developing countries. Also, it explores WTO’s DSM with a case study of the Combed Cotton Case between the United States and Pakistan. In closing, the need to improve WTO’s DSM is outlined.
Why are developing countries important to the WTO?
Approximately two-thirds of the WTO’s members are developing countries (WTO 2015b). Developing countries play a pivotal role in the organization because of their numbers. Also, developing countries are becoming significant in the globalized economy. Apart from that, developing countries play an active role in the organization because they consider trade as a pivotal tool in their development programs or projects. It is worth outlining that developing countries present an extremely diverse group in the WTO with different concerns and views. WTO agreements entail special provision for this group. For instance, the agreements contain provisions that give least-developed and developing nations more kindness or special rights (WTO 2015b). One of the provisions allows developing nations to be treated more considerately by developed countries than other members.
What is the role of the WTO?
One of the roles of the WTO entails implementing provisions and rules related to the global trade policy review mechanism (WTO 2015a). The WTO also provides a platform for member states to develop strategies related to tariffs and trade . The organization also provides facilities for administration and execution of bilateral and multilateral trade agreements. Also, the WTO administers not only the rules and procedures, but also the processes linked to dispute settlement. The procedure for resolving trade disagreements as outlined in the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) is essential for ensuring that trade rules are enforced and international trade flows smoothly (Shedd, Murrill & Smith 2012, p. 1). Countries that feel that their business rights have been infringed file cases at the WTO. It is the role of the organization to encourage countries to settle their trade-related disputes through consultations (Shedd, Murrill & Smith 2012, p. 5). Failure to address their differences, the disputing countries is required to follow a clearly mapped-out, systematic procedure that provides the possibility to appeal a ruling by the panel on legal grounds. In its efforts, the organization ensures that global resources such as oil and natural gas are used optimally. Most importantly, WTO assists intergovernmental organization such as the World Bank, and IMF is catalyzing economic development in developing nations (WTO 2015b).
Why is the WTO important?
The success of the WTO is attributed to the reduction of hurdles to global trade and the fact that governments carry out trade by agreed rules (WTO 2015b). By eliminating or reducing trade barriers, the multilateral system also removes other barriers between nations. The result of the WTO membership is guarantee that manufacturers and consumers can benefit from diversified pool of products and secure supplies of both, raw materials and finished products. Producers are assured that foreign markets will be available for their products. WTO is also a major player in the area of global governance. As from 1995, WTO has expanded the reach of international trade rules rooted in the regulatory structure of over 160 countries, influencing the daily lives of people across the globe. The vibrancy of global trade calls for the reforms in the WTO’s role and processes.
How effective are global trade rules?
Global trade rules are effective when they are enforced with proper entities, systems and processes. The WTO develops and implements international rules regarding trade between committed countries. Trade disputes arise when WTO member state infringes a trade commitment or agreement bound by the WTO. The main task of WTO is to ensure that cross border trade flows are as smooth, free and predictable as possible. From the Pakistani experience, it is apparent that governments should play a more proactive role in international trade-related disputes than they were in the past. Disputes should also be settled through consultation where possible to reduce the cases of formal complaints presented to the Dispute Settlement Body. Formal cases or disputes against least developed member states should be avoided at all costs to lessen the backlog of disputes at the WTO.
What are the barriers to the enforcement of DSB?
One of the barriers is a lack of capacity or expertise to litigate in the world trade organization. Initiating a WTO dispute is an extremely costly process in terms of money and time because of the complexity of the procedure and likelihood of the litigation to having to entail various stages (Böhmelt & Spilker 2013). The development of legal expertise to take part in WTO litigation is a worthwhile investment for both, developing and developed countries. For example, based on the number of cases the EU or the United States is involved in a respondents or complaints, these entities need a solid domestic legal expertise. For developing countries, the development of such legal expertise would probably not be profitable. However, external advisors may be recruited to support complex disputes. According to Torres (2012, p.1), Latin-American nations have overcome some of these challenges by developing creative and innovative solutions, without deviating from the initial guiding principles established by WTO rules.
What is the WTO dispute settlement system?
The World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement system is a remarkable example of international ‘rule of law’ and multilateral adjudication. The WTO grants several rights to its members, and the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) provides a rule-oriented consultative and judicial mechanism to protect and enforce these rights in cases ...
How does a dispute affect WTO participation?
The nature of a dispute, chances of winning and implementation of award, a country’s negotiating clout and its retaliation capacity can impact its ability to realise the full benefits of WTO DSU participation. For instance, a Member State with poor retaliation capacity and bargaining power may prefer not to invoke DSU provisions even if a WTO-inconsistent measure injures its trade interests. This is especially so in cases where the challenged measure is maintained by an important trading partner or a country with a relatively stronger bargaining, litigation and retaliation capacity. Moreover, a country may decide against launching a formal action after unsuccessful rounds of bilateral negotiations with an offending Member State if the anticipated cost and time involved in dispute settlement procedures exceed the expected benefits of settlement, or if the nature of a dispute makes a formal action socially, diplomatically or politically undesirable due to reasons beyond economics.
How does WTO help countries?
Open markets and an increase in foreign trade activities can create more employment and investment opportunities, and thereby contribute to a country’s better living standards and overall development. 2 More particularly, WTO dispute settlement experience can enhance the Member States’ understanding of, and expertise in, international trade law, which the governments can utilise in identifying WTO-incompatible foreign trade practices and invoking WTO DSU provisions. With the experience, expertise and confidence to invoke the WTO rules, the governments can develop bargaining strategies, which they can employ to amicably resolve (and diffuse) trade conflicts and thereby protect their industries’ trade interests in the ‘shadow of a potential WTO litigation’. 3 Galanter refers to this process as ‘litigotiation’, as he observes that ‘the career of most cases does not lead to full-blown trial and adjudication but consists of negotiation and manoeuvre in the strategic pursuit of settlement through mobilization of the court process.’ 4 In this manner, developing countries can strengthen their negotiating abilities once they have strengthened their litigation abilities.
How to address capacity related challenges?
The first option is to introduce changes at the international level (which can include changing WTO rules), and the second option is to find solutions at the domestic level. The first option can be explored through proposals presented by developing countries, and by academics and organisations committed to the notion of WTO reform The second option can be explored by making use of the first-hand experiences of certain upper middle, middle and lower middle income countries that have employed varied strategies to mobilise resources for the utilisation of DSU provisions.
How does the WTO protect its member states?
The WTO empowers its Member State to protect and expand its foreign market access by challenging foreign trade practices and defending its measures through a time-defined procedure of consultation, litigation and implementation. One of the key objectives of WTO DSU is to enhance a country’s overall economic growth and development, by reducing trade barriers and expanding foreign trade through multilateral regulation.
What are the rights of third parties in WTO?
Third parties to WTO disputes enjoy substantial rights of participation: (i) they can be physically present in substantive meetings at consultative, Panel and Appellate stage; (ii) they can deliver written and oral submissions during the first round of litigation; (iii) they can receive the first submissions filed by the complainant (s) and respondent (s); and (iv) they can also be granted additional rights on a case-by-case basis. 23 The provision allows Member States to comprehensively observe dispute settlement proceedings, and they can utilise this experience of observation to expand their understanding of WTO laws and dispute settlement system in a cost-effective manner. Along with many other MICs, BIC countries have clearly realised these benefits, as they have participated frequently as third party participants to improve their understanding of the system by ‘learning through observation’. Given this enthusiasm, it is an opportune time to evaluate the strategies MICs, particularly large MICs, have employed to develop in a cost-effective way their WTO dispute settlement capacity.
What is the definition of developing countries?
Under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1947, the term ‘developing’ was used for those countries where the economies ‘… [could] only support low standards of living and [were] in the early stage of development’. 18 The WTO agreements have not provided any definition or classification of the term, as they have incorporated a system of self-classification. The WTO allows Member States to self-designate themselves as developed or developing countries, and it adheres to the UN’s definition and classification of least developed countries (LDCs), which is based on GNP per capita, human assets and economic vulnerability indicators. 19
Abstract
This chapter examines the barriers posed for smaller and poorer World Trade Organization (WTO) members to challenge trade barriers under the WTO's dispute settlement understanding. It first addresses the implications of the judicialization of the WTO's dispute settlement system.
Citation
Shaffer, G. (2009), "Chapter 7 Developing Country Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System: Why it Matters, the Barriers Posed", Hartigan, J.C. (Ed.) Trade Disputes and the Dispute Settlement Understanding of the WTO: An Interdisciplinary Assessment ( Frontiers of Economics and Globalization, Vol. 6 ), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp.
The Role of The World Trade Organization
WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism
- Disputes are inevitable and emerge when a WTO member state contends that another member state has violated a commitment or agreement that is bound by the WTO. The WTO’s DSM is a fundamental aspect of the Multilateral Trading System for developing countries (Torres 2012, p. 1). In the same context, developing countries face several challenges while ...
Developing and Non-Participating Countries in WTO
- The original signatories of the WTO are parties to the GATT following the endorsement of the WTO in 1995. Other members joined WTO through negotiations. The process of membership is unique to the applicants, whereas terms of accessing depend on the applicant’s level of economic development. Some of the member states include Argentina, Belgium, Rwanda, Pakistan, China, …
Pakistan Experience: The U.S. – Cotton Yarn Case
- The Combed Cotton Case was a dispute between Pakistan and the U.S. over the institution of quantitative limits on Pakistani exports of combed cotton to America. The case began on 24 December 1998 with the United States claiming that exports from Pakistan had a negative influence on the United States textile industry (Hussain 2005, p. 459). As of consequence, transn…
The Need to Improve The WTO’s DSM
- Trade disputes are unavoidable, and can be constructive if addressed positively. Also, the nature of disputes is increasingly changing the realm of globalization. While the DSM provides an avenue for developing countries to find solutions for their grievances, the mechanism also presents various challenges, including funding, inability to enforce DSB solutions, economic and political …