Is American settlement services the same company as nationwide?
The company is based in Springfield, MO and has been in business since 2013. According to an employer review website called Glassdoor, one current or former employee of the company said that American Settlement Services is the same company as Nationwide Settlement Solutions.
Is American settlement a multi-location business?
The company stated, “American Settlement will continue to monitor its operation and address any specific complaints.” This is a multi-location business. Need to find a different location? Need to file a complaint?
Can I cancel my timeshare with American settlement services?
The American Settlement Services website is pretty typical for a timeshare exit company. The company claims it can cancel timeshare contracts with a 100% guarantee. A guarantee like this doesn’t actually mean anything if the company charges up-front.
What does American settlement do with do not call lists?
The company buys client lists and they place consumers on their internal do not call list when they are reached in error. The company stated, “American Settlement will continue to monitor its operation and address any specific complaints.” This is a multi-location business. Need to find a different location?
Why Structured Settlements?
It is easy for those who have been awarded single large sums in personal injury cases to become overwhelmed by the burden of managing the money to pay for a lifetime of medical needs and living expenses. You shouldn’t have to add this additional stress when your focus should be on healing and returning to a normal life.
Why You Can Trust ASC
The American Settlement Corporation is a leading structured settlement company based in Atlanta with offices in Michigan and Florida.
How much does American Settlement Solutions cost?
However, complaints on the BBB for Nationwide Settlement Solutions (which is the same company) shows customers mentioning prices starting at $9,500 and being negotiated down to $3,500.
Is American Settlement Services the same as Nationwide Settlement Solutions?
According to an employer review website called Glassdoor, one current or former employee of the company said that American Settlement Services is the same company as Nationwide Settlement Solutions.
Does American Settlement Services offer in person consultations?
When reviewing the company’s testimonial page, it looks like American Settlement Services is inviting timeshare owners out to in- person consultations. This is usually an unnecessary step that increases the price of a timeshare cancellation service. Many timeshare exit companies invite owners in for an in-person consultation so they can use hard sales tactics on the timeshare owner. These in-person consultations are usually set up similar to how a timeshare resort sales presentation is set up.
Is Nationwide Settlement Solutions rated?
American Settlement Services now has 18 complaints on the BBB and is not rated.
Is American Settlement Services a bad company?
American Settlement Services reviews online are overwhelmingly negative. The company has received 18 total complaints on the BBB over the past 3 years and also has several negative reviews on their Google My Business page. The company also operates under the name of Nationwide Settlement Solutions, which has an F with the BBB and several warnings. Nationwide Settlement Solutions has 47 complaints on the BBB as of Aug. 28, 2018.
Who owns American Settlement Services?
Additional Information: American Settlement Services is owned by Michael D. Myers. Mr. Myers also owns Nationwide Settlement Solutions on which BBB maintains separate Business Profile. Here is a link to that report: https://www.bbb.org/stlouis/business-reviews/timeshare-advocates/nationwide-settlement-solutions-in-springfield-mo-310619619
Is Better Business Bureau advising consumers to use caution when considering doing business with American Settlement Solutions?
Better Business Bureau is advising consumers to use caution when considering doing business with American Settlement Solutions, a Timeshare transfer company. BBB has received a pattern of consumer complaints alleging failure to issue refunds, failure to cancel contracts, misleading sales presentation, harassing phone calls and overall poor cu…
What is the settlement agreement with National Systems America?
On January 14, 2021, the Division signed a settlement agreement with National Systems America, LP (NSA) to resolve claims based on its independent investigation into whether the company engaged in discrimination based on citizenship status in the hiring and employment eligibility verification processes in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B) and (a) (6). The company recruits employees using a foreign company as its agent, and directly hires them to perform IT work for NSA clients. IER’s investigation concluded that the company (1) engaged in a pattern or practice of recruiting and hiring only U.S. citizens or U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents for certain positions without legal justification, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B); and (2) on numerous occasions, requested copies of Permanent Resident Cards to confirm the citizenship status and work authorization of candidates who identified themselves as lawful permanent residents during the applicant screening process, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (6). Under the settlement agreement, the company will pay a civil penalty of $34,200 to the United States and train its employees on the requirements of the INA’s anti-discrimination provision, and be subject to departmental reporting requirements.
What is the settlement agreement with Adaequare?
(Adaequare) to resolve an independent investigation into whether the company engaged in citizenship or immigration status discrimination in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B). IER’s investigation concluded that the company, which recruits workers for other entities, engaged in discrimination in the hiring or recruitment/referral for a fee processes by considering only applicants who were U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents when filling a job for a client. Under the settlement agreement, the company will pay a civil penalty to the United States, train its employees on anti-discrimination obligations, and be subject to departmental reporting requirements.
What is the settlement agreement with Chancery Staffing?
On February 18, 2020, the Division signed a settlement agreement with Chancery Staffing Solutions LLC, aka TransPerfect Staffing Solutions , a legal staffing company headquartered in New York, NY. The Division had previously filed a lawsuit in May 2019 alleging that from at least April 4, 2017 to at least July 7, 2017, the company (while operating as TransPerfect Staffing), had implemented a client directive restricting its recruitment and hiring of attorneys for a document review project to U.S. citizens only, and later, to U.S. citizens without dual citizenship. Under the settlement agreement, Chancery Staffing will pay a civil penalty of $27,000, provide back pay to victims identified during the term of the settlement agreement, and participate in Division-provided training on the anti-discrimination provision contained in 8 U.S.C. § 1324b. Chancery Staffing will also obtain supporting documentation from clients that request a citizenship status restriction when staffing a project to help ensure that any such restriction is lawful.
What is the Facebook lawsuit?
citizens, U.S. nationals, refugees, asylees, and recent lawful permanent residents) in its recruitment and hiring practices, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1). The lawsuit alleges that Facebook routinely refused to recruit, consider, or hire U.S. workers for positions that it reserved for temporary visa holders in connection with the permanent labor certification process (“PERM”). The complaint alleges that beginning no later than January 1, 2018 and lasting until at least September 18, 2019, Facebook used recruiting methods designed to deter U.S. workers from applying to positions reserved for temporary visa holders, refused to consider U.S. workers who applied to the positions, and hired only temporary visa holders for the positions.
What was the settlement agreement with Tuscany Hotel and Casino?
On October 10, 2012, the Department of Justice issued a press release announcing a settlement agreement with Tuscany Hotel and Casino resolving a lawsuit alleging the company discriminated against certain non-U.S. citizen s during the employment eligibility verification and reverification processes by requesting those individuals to provide more or different documents or information than required under Form I-9 rules based on their citizenship status. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Tuscany agreed to pay a civil penalty of $49,000 to the government and full back pay to an economic victim. Tuscany will also receive OSC-sponsored training regarding the anti-discrimination provision of the INA, be subject to reporting and monitoring requirements, and will revise its employment eligibility verification procedures.
When did ChemArt settle?
ChemArt (Unfair Documentary Practices and Retaliation) June 2020. On June 3, 2020, IER signed a settlement agreement with ChemArt, a Rhode Island manufacturing company, resolving claims that the company discriminated against a worker during the employment eligibility verification process and then retaliated against her.
What is the Ikon settlement agreement?
On December 8, 2020, the Division signed a settlement agreement with Ikon Systems , LLC , resolving claims that Ikon routinely discriminated against U.S. workers (U.S. citizens, U.S. nationals, recent lawful permanent residents , asylees, and refugees) by posting job advertisements specifying a preference for applicants with temporary work visas, and that Ikon failed to consider at least one U.S. citizen applicant who applied to a discriminatory advertisement. Specifically, IER’s investigation found that from at least May 8, 2019, to September 21, 2019, Ikon posted at least eight job advertisements for information technology (“IT”) positions that solicited applications from non-U.S. citizens with immigration statuses associated with certain employment-based visas and, in so doing, harmed U.S. workers by unlawfully deterring or failing to fairly consider them for hire, including the Charging Party. Under the agreement, Ikon will pay a civil penalty of $27,000 to the United States, revise its policies and procedures, train relevant employees and agents on the requirements of the INA’s anti-discrimination provision, and be subject to departmental reporting requirements during the agreement’s two-year term. Separately, Ikon will pay the $15,000 to the Charging Party.