
If a lawsuit against a tobacco company settles or goes to trial, you can receive compensation for injuries or death resulting from cigarette use. Many companies entertain settlements in these cases. As such, it is important to know how tobacco settlement payments to individuals work.
How much money do States receive from tobacco settlement payments?
However, this is less than 2 cents of every dollar or close to $26 billion total that states receive from tobacco settlement payments and tobacco taxes each and every year.
How many States entered into a Master Settlement Agreement with tobacco companies?
[15] On November 23, 1998, the Attorneys General of the remaining 46 states, as well as of the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands, entered into the Master Settlement Agreement with the four largest manufacturers of cigarettes in the United States.
How much do States spend on tobacco cessation programs?
In total, states are spending close to $470 million on tobacco prevention and cessation programs in the 2015-2016 fiscal year. However, this is less than 2 cents of every dollar or close to $26 billion total that states receive from tobacco settlement payments and tobacco taxes each and every year.
How did the tobacco companies get money from the government?
Basically, the tobacco companies had money; the states and their hired-gun attorneys wanted money; so the companies paid and the states collected. Then sick smokers got stuck with the bill.

What are the services that are not counted in the septic system?
Health care education, outreach, screening, laboratory services, counseling, and case management may be counted. However, environmental services such as mosquito control, water testing, and septic tank inspection may not be counted.
Do counties have to include the trust fund?
Counties may only include the expenditures made out of the trust fund. It should not include amounts set aside in the trust fund, but may include expenditures made out of the trust fund if they are used for health care services and the county does not receive reimbursement for those services.
Can a foundation give money to a county?
However, if the foundation gave the money to the county as a general donation, giving the county clear authority to use the money at the county’s discretion, and the county used the money on health care, then the county could count the use of such funds as an unreimbursed health care expenditure.
Can a political subdivision spend the money it receives from the tobacco settlement for any purpose it chooses?
May a political subdivision spend the money it receives from the tobacco settlement for any purpose it chooses?#N#Yes, the use of the money is unrestricted. The settlement agreement does not require that it be spent for a particular purpose.
Is tobacco settlement based on pro rata?
Yes, because all pro rata shares, beginning in 2000, are based on unreimbursed health care expenditures, as defined in the settlement agreement and health care expenditures made with tobacco settlement proceeds are treated as unreimbursed. See #12.
What is the tobacco master settlement agreement?
The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement ( MSA) was entered in November 1998, originally between the four largest United States tobacco companies ( Philip Morris Inc., R. J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson and Lorillard – the "original participating manufacturers", referred to as the "Majors") and the attorneys general of 46 states. The states settled their Medicaid lawsuits against the tobacco industry for recovery of their tobacco-related health-care costs. In exchange, the companies agreed to curtail or cease certain tobacco marketing practices, as well as to pay, in perpetuity, various annual payments to the states to compensate them for some of the medical costs of caring for persons with smoking-related illnesses. The money also funds a new anti-smoking advocacy group, called the Truth Initiative, that is responsible for such campaigns as Truth and maintains a public archive of documents resulting from the cases.
How many lawsuits were filed against tobacco companies?
By the mid-1950s, individuals in the United States began to sue the companies responsible for manufacturing and marketing cigarettes for damages related to the effects of smoking. In the forty years through 1994, over 800 private claims were brought against tobacco companies in state courts across the country. The individuals asserted claims for negligent manufacture, negligent advertising, fraud, and violation of various state consumer protection statutes. The tobacco companies were successful against these lawsuits. Only two plaintiffs ever prevailed, and both of those decisions were reversed on appeal. As scientific evidence mounted in the 1980s, tobacco companies claimed contributory negligence as they asserted adverse health effects were previously unknown or lacked substantial credibility.
How long does it take for a SPM to join the Master Settlement Agreement?
As an incentive to join the Master Settlement Agreement, the agreement provides that, if an SPM joined within ninety days following the Master Settlement Agreement's "Execution Date," that SPM is exempt ("exempt SPM") from making annual payments to the settling states unless the SPM increases its share of the national cigarette market beyond its 1998 market share, or beyond 125% of that SPM's 1997 market share. If the exempt SPM's market share in a given year increases beyond those relevant historic limits, the MSA requires that the exempt SPM make annual payments to the settling states, similar to those made by the OPMs, but based only upon the SPM's sales representing the exempt SPM's market share increase.
What was the 1997 National Settlement Proposal?
This proposed congressional remedy (1997 National Settlement Proposal (NSP), a.k.a. the "June 20, 1997 Proposal") for the cigarette tobacco problem resembled the eventual Multistate Settlement Agreement (MSA), but with important differences. For example, although the congressional proposal would have earmarked one-third of all funds to combat teenage smoking, no such restrictions appear in the MSA. In addition, the congressional proposal would have mandated Food and Drug Administration oversight and imposed federal advertising restrictions. It also would have granted immunity from state prosecutions; eliminated punitive damages in individual tort suits; and prohibited the use of class actions, or other joinder or aggregation devices without the defendant's consent, assuring that only individual actions could be brought. The congressional proposal called for payments to the states of $368.5 billion over 25 years. By contrast, assuming that the Majors would maintain their market share, the MSA provides baseline payments of about $200 billion over 25 years. This baseline payment is subject to
How many plaintiffs have ever prevailed in the tobacco case?
Only two plaintiffs ever prevailed, and both of those decisions were reversed on appeal. As scientific evidence mounted in the 1980s, tobacco companies claimed contributory negligence as they asserted adverse health effects were previously unknown or lacked substantial credibility.
When was the Master Settlement Agreement signed?
Adoption of the "Master Settlement Agreement". In November 1998 , the Attorneys General of the remaining 46 states, as well as of the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands, entered into the Master Settlement Agreement with the four largest manufacturers of cigarettes in the United States.
When was smoking linked to heart disease?
Private lawsuits before the settlement. In September 1950, an article was published in the British Medical Journal linking smoking to lung cancer and heart disease. In 1954 the British Doctors Study confirmed the suggestion, based on which the government issued advice that smoking and lung cancer rates were related.
How much did tobacco companies pay in compensation?
In 1998, an historic landmark legal settlement between 46 states and the major tobacco companies, – along with individual settlements with four other states – required the companies to pay more than $246 billion over time as compensation for tobacco-related health care costs.
How much does tobacco spend on marketing?
According to the most recent data from the Federal Trade Commission (for 2017), the major cigarette and smokeless tobacco companies spend $9.4 billion a year – over $1 million each hour – on marketing.
How much money will the CDC spend on tobacco in 2020?
This year (fiscal year 2020), the states will collect $27.2 billion from the 1998 tobacco settlement and tobacco taxes. But they will spend less than 3% – just $739.7 million – on programs to prevent kids from using tobacco and help smokers quit - less than a quarter (22.4%) of the total funding recommended by the CDC.
How many high schoolers use e-cigarettes?
The number of kids who use e-cigarettes has skyrocketed to over 5.3 million, including more than one in four (27.5%) high school students, and recent trends indicate that nearly 5,000 more kids start using e-cigarettes each day.
Which states have banned flavored e-cigarettes?
Massachusetts has prohibited the sale of all flavored tobacco products, including flavored e-cigarettes and menthol cigarettes, while Michigan has banned flavored e-cigarettes.
When is the deadline for cigarette warnings?
meet a court-ordered deadline of March 15, 2020, for issuing a final rule requiring graphic cigarette warnings.
Why did Trump reverse the ban on vaping?
President Trump in September announced a plan to ban the sale of all flavored e-cigarettes, in response to an increasing number of lung injuries in the U.S. linked to vaping. However, Trump then decided against signing a decision memo on the ban, citing concern over potential job losses.
Where do the tobacco protection funds go?
The payments go directly from smokers’ pockets to the State treasuries after being “laundered” through the tobacco companies that were basically forced to pay “protection money” to the Mob or face the consequences. I’m pretty sure there are no provisions for individual citizens to touch the funds in any State, though I’d be interested in knowing about it if I’m wrong.
How long does it take to file a claim against a tobacco company?
You file a claim against the tobacco Co. If they don't answer or respond within 30 days, it becomes law.
Why do people quit smoking?
And they’ve done it without “hitting bottom” through jail, horrible accidents, killing people in fights, overdosing, extreme medical consequences, or waking up in the gutter — usually quitting just because of social pressure, relatively mild financial expenditure (at least when compared to most illegal drugs), or concerns about far future possibilities of health consequences.
Where does MSA money go?
In most States (49 of them in fact) the MSA funds go directly to the State, and are used for whatever purpose they wish. In theory the money is for treating ill smokers and funding local tobacco control - but as often as not it goes into whatever they have a current financial problem with, such as funding the State employee pensions. Indeed, the impression is that less than 2% of the MSA funds, overall, are assigned to their original purpose.
Can smokers sue a cigarette manufacturer?
In States that did not sign up to the Master Settlement Agreement, individual smokers (or their surviving families or estates) have successfully sued a cigarette manufacturer, sometimes as individuals and sometimes in a class action. Recent cases include Florida’s Robinson/RJR case, which resolved to a $17m award. Florida has several cases outstanding, more on that here: Tobacco giants settle smoking lawsuits for $100M. Some of these cases can be found by searching ‘tallahassee tobacco suit’ and similar.
Can smokers sue a CI?
In States that did not sign up to the Master Settlement Agreement, individual smokers (or their surviving families or estates) have successfully sued a ci
Can you settle a tobacco dispute?
You can’t. The Master Settlement Agreement was a deal between the tobacco companies and the states, settling litigation by the states.
Why are tobacco companies filing lawsuits?
For more than 50 years, tobacco users, their families and government entities have been filing lawsuits against tobacco companies due to the products’ connection with various types of cancer and other diseases.
When did tobacco lawsuits start?
Tobacco litigation reemerged in the 1980s and 90s when plaintiffs began filing lawsuits claiming that big tobacco companies knew cigarette smoking caused lung cancer and that cigarettes were addictive. In most cases, tobacco companies argued that smokers knowingly assumed the risks associated with smoking. Tobacco companies were largely successful in defending these lawsuits.
Is There a Tobacco Class Action?
Several class action lawsuits have been filed against tobacco manufacturers claiming that the companies knowingly sold the products and concealed the hazards associated with them. While one particular class action lawsuit was thrown out of the Florida Supreme Court in 2006, other suits have been filed on behalf of cigarette smokers.
What are the health risks of smoking?
Smoking has the potential to harm every organ of the body, affecting a person’s overall health. According to the CDC, other serious health risks linked to cigarettes and smoking include: 1 Risks associated with pregnancy, including preterm delivery, stillbirth, low birth weight, sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS or crib death), ectopic pregnancy and orofacial clefts in infants 2 Problems affecting men’s sperm, which can lead to a reduction in fertility and an increase for birth defects and miscarriage 3 Greater risks affecting bone health 4 Tooth loss 5 Increased risk for cataracts and age-related macular degeneration, a condition characterized by damage to a small spot near the center of the retina 6 Risk of developing type 2 diabetes 7 Adverse effects such as inflammation and decreased immune function 8 Risk of rheumatoid arthritis
How many times more likely is it to die from lung cancer if you smoke?
Additionally, people who smoke cigarettes are 15 to 30 times more likely to get lung cancer or die from lung cancer than people who do not smoke. Call to Get Help Today: (888) 888-0612.
How does smoking affect the world?
Likewise, smoking causes more deaths each year than HIV, illegal drug use, alcohol use, motor vehicle injuries and firearm-related incidents combined. Smoking is also estimated to increase to increase the risk for coronary disease, stroke and lung cancer.
Why were cigarettes recalled?
Approximately 8 billion cigarettes were recalled because the company detected unusual tastes and peculiar odors during production and identified methyl isothiocyanate (MITC), a poisonous chemical that may cause severe eye, respiratory, and skin irritation as well as pain, vomiting, and blindness.

General Information
- Who is qualified to receive an annual pro rata share of the tobacco settlement proceeds? Political subdivisions as defined in 25 Tex. Admin. Code § 102.1(b). These include “a hospital district, ano...
- How can I determine whether a given political subdivision qualifies for tobacco settlement proceeds under this definition? Consult Chapter 61 of the Texas Health and Safety Code pert…
- Who is qualified to receive an annual pro rata share of the tobacco settlement proceeds? Political subdivisions as defined in 25 Tex. Admin. Code § 102.1(b). These include “a hospital district, ano...
- How can I determine whether a given political subdivision qualifies for tobacco settlement proceeds under this definition? Consult Chapter 61 of the Texas Health and Safety Code pertaining to the C...
- How can I get a copy of the settlement agreement? A text copy of the settlement agreement is available online or may be requested via e-mail at [email protected] telephone at 512.776.2591.
- What was the total settlement amount, initially, for political subdivisions? The settlement agr…
Distribution Calculation
- Once the DSHS receives the expenditure statements, how will it apportion the available dollars among the political subdivisions? The DSHS combines eligible expenditures from all statements received...
Use of Tobacco Settlement Proceeds
- May a political subdivision spend the money it receives from the tobacco settlement for any purpose it chooses? Yes, the use of the money is unrestricted. The settlement agreement does not require...
- What are some of the ways in which political subdivisions intend to use the tobacco settlement proceeds? Use of funds varies widely, based on information received by the DSHS.
- May a political subdivision spend the money it receives from the tobacco settlement for any purpose it chooses? Yes, the use of the money is unrestricted. The settlement agreement does not require...
- What are some of the ways in which political subdivisions intend to use the tobacco settlement proceeds? Use of funds varies widely, based on information received by the DSHS.
- Is there any incentive for political subdivisions to spend their tobacco settlement proceeds on health care? Yes, because all pro rata shares, beginning in 2000, are based on unreimbursed health ca...
General Information Regarding Counties
- Should counties coordinate with cities to determine how best to maximize funds for reimbursement? Yes, counties should coordinate with cities to maximize all dollars being spent on health care in t...
- More specifically, for what kinds of services can a county expect to receive payment under the settlement agreement? These must be for services such as a hospital district may provide. T…
- Should counties coordinate with cities to determine how best to maximize funds for reimbursement? Yes, counties should coordinate with cities to maximize all dollars being spent on health care in t...
- More specifically, for what kinds of services can a county expect to receive payment under the settlement agreement? These must be for services such as a hospital district may provide. They will ty...
- May a county include expendable medical supplies such as bandages, medications, and syringes? Yes, medical supplies may be included, but administrative supplies, such as copy paper, can be counted...
- Are expenditures related to medical waste disposal, including the destruction of drugs and n…
County Jail, Sheriff, & Prisoner Information
- May a county include the salary and benefits of the nurse in a county jail? Yes, under 25 Tex. Admin. Code § 102.3(b)(1)(J), the county may include employee salary and benefits to the extent the em...
- If a county hires a private contractor to provide inmate medical care, would it be considered an eligible expenditure? Yes, the county can claim the contract amount.
- May a county include the salary and benefits of the nurse in a county jail? Yes, under 25 Tex. Admin. Code § 102.3(b)(1)(J), the county may include employee salary and benefits to the extent the em...
- If a county hires a private contractor to provide inmate medical care, would it be considered an eligible expenditure? Yes, the county can claim the contract amount.
- May a county include drug testing for the sheriff’s department personnel? No, the expense must be related to health care for the general public or the inmates of the county jail.
- Can the expense of mental competency hearings or mental health commitments in the court system be included as a possible expense? No, court costs and deputy sheriff’s time spent transporting a pris...
Hospital District & County Information
- If you have a hospital district that does not cover the entire county, is the hospital district responsible for claiming jail health care? No, the county will file its own report and will include i...
- If a county has a hospital district that covers the entire county, which entity will count the unreimbursed health care expenditures for inmates of the county jail – the county or the hos…
- If you have a hospital district that does not cover the entire county, is the hospital district responsible for claiming jail health care? No, the county will file its own report and will include i...
- If a county has a hospital district that covers the entire county, which entity will count the unreimbursed health care expenditures for inmates of the county jail – the county or the hospital dist...
- What expenditures may be claimed by a political subdivision that has sold its public hospital to a private company? Note the following provision in 25 Tex. Admin. Code § 102.3(e)for the distributio...
- Who submits an expenditure statement when a new hospital district comes into existence in …
Overview
The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) was entered on November 23, 1998, originally between the four largest United States tobacco companies (Philip Morris Inc., R. J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson and Lorillard – the "original participating manufacturers", referred to as the "Majors") and the attorneys general of 46 states. The states settled their Medicaid lawsuits against the tobacco industry for recovery of their tobacco-related health-care costs. In exchange, the compa…
History of adoption
In September 1950, an article was published in the British Medical Journal linking smoking to lung cancer and heart disease. In 1954 the British Doctors Study confirmed the suggestion, based on which the government issued advice that smoking and lung cancer rates were related. In 1964 the United States Surgeon General's Report on Smoking and Health likewise began suggesting the relatio…
Summary of terms
The Original Participating Manufacturers (OPMs) agreed to several broad categories of conditions:
• to restrict their advertising, sponsorship, lobbying, and litigation activities, particularly as those activities were seen as targeting youth;
• to disband three specific "Tobacco-Related Organizations," and to restrict their creation and participation in trade associations;
Contraband statutes
By the middle of 2000, domestic NPMs and importers had begun to obtain greater market share. The NAAG noted that reductions in settlement payments which result from an overall reduction in cigarette consumption benefit the states because health care costs imposed by each cigarette exceed the settlement payments. On the other hand, when reductions in settlement payments occur because NPM sales displace PM sales, the states receive no benefits if the NPMs do not …
Criticism
Some anti-smoking advocates, such as William Godshall, have criticized the MSA as being too lenient on the major tobacco companies. In a speech at the National Tobacco Control Conference, Godshall stated that "[w]ith unprecedented future legal protection granted by the state A.G.s in exchange for money, it appears that the tobacco industry has emerged from the state lawsuits even more powerful".
Securitization
In the ten years following the settlement, many state and local governments have opted to sell so-called Tobacco Bonds. They are a form of securitization. In many cases the bonds permit state and local governments to transfer the risk of declines in future master settlement agreement payments to bondholders. In some cases, however, the bonds are backed by secondary pledges of state or local revenues, which creates what some see as a perverse incentive to support the to…
Individual state settlements
There is technically a distinct MSA signed separately with each state. While these MSAs are identical, the states have had to enact enabling legislation which differs from state to state. Furthermore, each state's court system is entitled to create its own jurisdictional interpretations of the MSA text. As a result, legal understanding of the MSA differ from state to state.
Documents relating to the initial lawsuits filed by each individual state are available at the UCSF
See also
• Operation Berkshire
• Project SCUM
• Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation
• "Truth" ad campaign