Settlement FAQs

how to get a settlement from big tobacco

by Elfrieda Ankunding Published 2 years ago Updated 2 years ago
image

About twenty years ago, the big tobacco companies signed an agreement with all of the state Attorneys General to settle lawsuits that states had filed to limit tobacco advertising and to recoup tobacco-related health care costs. According to the terms of the agreement, settlement monies are paid directly to the states (and five U.S. territories).

Full Answer

What was the settlement with the tobacco industry?

Tobacco Settlement Led by Mississippi Attorney General Mike Moore, attorneys general from a number of states announced a settlement reached with the tobacco industry. The settlement created a trust fund to pay for medical costs resulting from tobacco addiction and ended the suits by several states and individuals for payment of such medical costs.

How many States entered into a Master Settlement Agreement with tobacco companies?

[15] On November 23, 1998, the Attorneys General of the remaining 46 states, as well as of the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands, entered into the Master Settlement Agreement with the four largest manufacturers of cigarettes in the United States.

What does the Big Tobacco Settlement mean for your retirement plans?

This twist has enormous implications for retirees, future retirees, and anyone searching for more income. Because of the Master Settlement Agreement, Big Tobacco must distribute cash to 46 states and five U.S. territories forever. And thanks to a special clause in this deal, Americans have the chance to claim 100% tax-free income from it.

Does big tobacco have to pay to settle a deceptive advertising case?

Unfortunately, there’s no merit to claims that big tobacco must pay individuals thousands of dollars per month to settle a deceptive advertising case from the 1990s — no payments are made directly to individuals under the settlement. The rumor started with a solicitation appearing at the investment website MoneyMorning.com.

image

What are tobacco settlement payments?

Under the Master Settlement Agreement, seven tobacco companies agreed to change the way they market tobacco products and to pay the states an estimated $206 billion.

Where did the tobacco settlement money go?

This year (fiscal year 2020), the states will collect $27.2 billion from the 1998 tobacco settlement and tobacco taxes. But they will spend less than 3% – just $739.7 million – on programs to prevent kids from using tobacco and help smokers quit - less than a quarter (22.4%) of the total funding recommended by the CDC.

Can I sue tobacco companies for COPD?

Yes, you can still sue tobacco companies in certain cases. You may be able to bring an action as an individual or, in some cases, as a representative of a class in a class action.

Who won the tobacco lawsuit?

In 2006, the American Cancer Society and other plaintiffs won a major court case against Big Tobacco. Judge Gladys Kessler found tobacco companies guilty of lying to the American public about the deadly effects of cigarettes and secondhand smoke.

When was the tobacco lawsuit settled?

In 1998, 52 state and territory attorneys general signed the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) with the four largest tobacco companies in the U.S. to settle dozens of state lawsuits brought to recover billions of dollars in health care costs associated with treating smoking-related illnesses.

What was the result of the 1998 tobacco settlement?

In the largest civil litigation settlement in U.S. history, the states and territories scored a victory that resulted in the tobacco companies paying the states and territories billions of dollars in yearly installments.

Can you sue for nicotine addiction?

As of 2019, several nicotine addiction lawsuits seek compensation from these companies. Compensation from a lawsuit can help pay for: Hospital bills. Medications.

Can I claim compensation for COPD?

If you have been diagnosed with an COPD or another respiratory-related illness, you may be able to claim compensation. A successful claim requires you to prove that your illness was caused by negligent acts or omissions by your employer.

Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking related diseases?

Tobacco companies use slick and persuasive marketing to promote their product. The individual is not to be blamed for responding to these messages and becoming hopelessly addicted to tobacco. Tobacco companies, not the smoker, should be held responsible if smoking results in disease and death.

How long did tobacco litigation last?

In the forty years through 1994, over 800 private claims were brought against tobacco companies in state courts across the country.

Did tobacco companies lie?

In 2006, the US District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that tobacco companies were guilty of breaking civil racketeering laws, marketing to children and minority populations, and lying to the public about the dangers of smoking.

What happened Big Tobacco?

Now, after fighting and delaying the court's order for 11 years, Big Tobacco has finally been forced to begin publishing advertisements, or “corrective statements” outlining these truths. The ads will appear in about 50 newspapers and on major broadcast networks nationwide articulating the ills of tobacco.

Does the government get money from cigarettes?

State and local governments collected $19 billion in revenue from tobacco taxes in 2019, which was 0.6 percent of state and local general revenue.

How tobacco settlement money helps Disease prevention and health Promotion?

The American Lung Association believes that states must use these tobacco settlement dollars, which are intended to compensate states for the healthcare costs from treating sick smokers and former smokers, and revenue from tobacco taxes to fund robust tobacco prevention programs to help tackle the #1 preventable cause ...

What price did the tobacco companies have to pay for hiding the truth from consumers?

In the MSA, the original participating manufacturers (OPM) agreed to pay a minimum of $206 billion over the first 25 years of the agreement.

How much does the tobacco industry spend on lobbying?

Tobacco companies spend millions of dollars lobbying in the U.S. every year. In 2020, while we faced a global respiratory pandemic, tobacco companies spent $28,156,312 at the federal level attempting to weaken public health and tobacco control policies (source).

What is the tobacco settlement?

StateAG.org’s The Tobacco Settlement commemorates the historic fight against big tobacco and the men and women who led these efforts on behalf of the states.

What was the purpose of the settlement of the tobacco addiction lawsuit?

The settlement created a trust fund to pay for medical costs resulting from tobacco addiction and ended the suits by several states and individuals for payment of such medical costs. The settlement also prohibited class action law suits against tobacco companies in the future.

Which state is the fifth to join the tobacco litigation?

Massachusetts became the fifth state to join the litigation. In December 1998, the National Association of Attorneys General awarded Tom the NAAG President's Distinguished Service Award for his work nationally on the state tobacco litigation and settlements.

How much money could you collect from Big Tobacco?

Could You Collect Tax-Free Cash Thanks to Big Tobacco? You could begin collecting $2,300 a month thanks to “Master Settlement Payments,” courtesy of Big Tobacco.

What is the Master Settlement Agreement?

The Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) is an accord reached in November 1998 between the state Attorneys General of 46 states, five U.S. territories, the District of Columbia and the five largest tobacco companies in America concerning the advertising, marketing and promotion of tobacco products. In addition to requiring the tobacco industry to pay the settling states approximately $10 billion annually for the indefinite future, the MSA also set standards for, and imposed restrictions on, the sale and marketing of cigarettes by participating cigarette manufacturers.

Does MSA require settlement payments?

The MSA imposes no requirements on how states spend their MSA payments; states are free to use the funds for any purpose. As a result, the receipt of millions of MSA dollars has presented states with a unique opportunity to finance programs in a variety of policy areas. Although the MSA does not require states to spend settlement payments on tobacco control programs, many antismoking and health care observers are concerned that states are not using enough of the MSA payments to enhance their tobacco prevention and control efforts.

How many tobacco companies have settled under the MSA?

Eventually, more than 45 tobacco companies settled with the Settling States under the MSA. Although Florida, Minnesota, Mississippi, and Texas are not signatories to the MSA, they have their own individual tobacco settlements, which occurred prior to the MSA.

What is the prohibition on tobacco companies?

Prohibiting tobacco companies from taking any action to target youth in the advertising, promotion or marketing of tobacco products.

What is the NAAG Center for Tobacco and Public Health?

The NAAG Center for Tobacco and Public Health works with the Settling States of the MSA to preserve and enforce the MSA’s monetary and public-health mandates, including: Representing, advising, and supporting the Settling States in MSA-related legal matters , including litigation and arbitrations.

What law gave the FDA the power to regulate tobacco products?

In 2009, the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act gave the FDA the power to regulate tobacco products. State attorneys general have been active participants in helping the FDA shape its regulatory authority.

How does the MSA affect smoking?

The MSA continues to have a profound effect on smoking in America, particularly among youth. Between 1998 and 2019 , U.S. cigarette consumption dropped by more than 50%. During that same time period, regular smoking by high schoolers dropped from its near peak of 36.4% in 1997 to a low 6.0% in 2019. As advocates for the public interest, state attorneys general are actively and successfully continuing to enforce the provisions of the MSA to reduce tobacco use and protect consumers.

What is the purpose of entering into agreements with major retail chains?

Entering into agreements with major retail chains to ensure that retailers comply with state laws setting the minimum age at which tobacco products may be purchased and limiting the quantity and content of tobacco advertising at retail locations.

What is the Truth Initiative?

Establishing and funding the Truth Initiative, an organization “dedicated to achieving a culture where all youth and young adults reject tobacco.”.

How much of the settlement funds are used for opioids?

The settlement agreement’s primary requirement is that states use at least 85% of the settlement funds on “opioid remediation.” While this is accompanied by a non-exhaustive list of evidence-based interventions, there is extensive flexibility for states to redefine and selectively enforce their spending parameters. There is a risk that funds will be used for other state priorities, resulting in opioid remediation and health outcomes remaining stagnant or worsening.

What is the Purdue Pharma settlement?

A multi-billion-dollar settlement between Purdue Pharma and states (separate from the aforementioned $26 billion settlement) would allow the company to never admit to any wrongdoing and avoid future opioid-related lawsuits.

What is the final agreement for opioid settlement?

For the opioid settlement funds to effectively supplement federal funds, the final agreement must include more oversight on how the funds are used when combined with other opioid-focused discretionary spending, including repercussions for misusing funds. Moreover, further guidance is needed around effective spending for opioid-related programs that ultimately reduce mortality. BPC is currently evaluating the use of federal funds with our Opioid Task Force. Stay tuned as the group will provide recommendations for blending and braiding funding streams to optimize spending in an upcoming report.

Is the opioid settlement a risk?

Much like the 1998 settlement with Big Tobacco, the opioid settlement poses similar funding allocation risks. There are already concerns among public health experts that:

Why did tobacco companies fight lawsuits?

They argued that tobacco wasn’t harmful or that the diseases had other sources .

What is the history of tobacco lawsuits?

Tobacco lawsuits have a unique place in the history of litigation. At one point in history, manufacturers of cigarettes, chew and other tobacco products were considered untouchable. Then, a tipping point was reached, and these once-invincible companies were forced to pay out millions of dollars to individuals, their families, and their estates.

Why did the Florida smokers join the class of 100,000?

He joined a class of 100,000 Florida smokers to seek damages on the basis that manufacturers failed to disclose the addictive nature of nicotine after they became aware of it .

How did smoking become a universal activity?

Smoking became a near-universal activity that was driven by social pressure and ad campaigns. Smoking was permitted nearly everywhere, including in restaurants, at the sports stadium and even on commercial flights.

How much more likely is a smoker to develop type 2 diabetes than a non-smoker?

Smokers are 30-40% more likely to develop type 2 diabetes than non-smokers according to the CDC. Smoking while diabetic increases risk of problems managing the disease.

What are the health effects of ad-supported tobacco?

The combination of widespread use driven by ads and heavy use driven by other factors quickly revealed serious adverse health effects including. Throat Cancer. Cancers of the throat can include tobacco-caused laryngeal cancer, as well as pharynx (upper throat).

When did tobacco lawsuits start?

The following is a brief walkthrough of the lawsuit developments through the years. The first litigants to sue tobacco manufacturers started filing in the 1950s.

Victimizing children

It took decades to generate enough momentum to compel Big Tobacco to settle, but one key tipping point was exposing how Big Tobacco allegedly sought to get children addicted to cigarettes. 2

A legal war chest

Lawsuits cost money, particularly those targeting wealthy defendants. For years, many plaintiff’s firms were reluctant to fund a case against Big Tobacco’s formidable defense team. 3 While the suits against Big Tobacco didn’t have the benefit of today’s litigation financing infrastructure, they were ultimately supported by some deep pockets.

Weaponizing science to sow doubt

One of the hallmarks of Big Tobacco’s defense was what one could call the “weaponization” of science to sow doubt upon research that linked cigarette smoking to cancer and other ailments. 5 Big Tobacco allegedly marshaled scientists and lobbying organizations to claim, for example, that cancer couldn’t be attributed to the smoking of cigarettes. 6

Victim blaming

Aside from shifting the narrative to other products they claimed to be injurious, Big Tobacco's defense strategy sometimes pinned the blame on the victims.

Novel legal theories

Decades of failures in Big Tobacco litigation forced plaintiff's firms to keep trying new strategies to achieve success.

Andrew Blancher, CPCU

Andrew Blancher, CPCU, is director of commercial automobile product development and Emerging Issues at Verisk. You can contact him at [email protected].

David Geller

David Geller, CPCU, SCLA, is product strategy manager, Underwriting Solutions at Verisk. He can be reached at [email protected].

How much did tobacco companies pay in compensation?

In 1998, an historic landmark legal settlement between 46 states and the major tobacco companies, – along with individual settlements with four other states – required the companies to pay more than $246 billion over time as compensation for tobacco-related health care costs.

How much does tobacco spend on marketing?

According to the most recent data from the Federal Trade Commission (for 2017), the major cigarette and smokeless tobacco companies spend $9.4 billion a year – over $1 million each hour – on marketing.

How much money will the CDC spend on tobacco in 2020?

This year (fiscal year 2020), the states will collect $27.2 billion from the 1998 tobacco settlement and tobacco taxes. But they will spend less than 3% – just $739.7 million – on programs to prevent kids from using tobacco and help smokers quit - less than a quarter (22.4%) of the total funding recommended by the CDC.

How many high schoolers use e-cigarettes?

The number of kids who use e-cigarettes has skyrocketed to over 5.3 million, including more than one in four (27.5%) high school students, and recent trends indicate that nearly 5,000 more kids start using e-cigarettes each day.

Which states have banned flavored e-cigarettes?

Massachusetts has prohibited the sale of all flavored tobacco products, including flavored e-cigarettes and menthol cigarettes, while Michigan has banned flavored e-cigarettes.

When is the deadline for cigarette warnings?

meet a court-ordered deadline of March 15, 2020, for issuing a final rule requiring graphic cigarette warnings.

What is the importance of e-cigarettes?

“The e-cigarette epidemic is disrupting the lives of kids and families in every community, so it is critical that every state step up and do its part to end this crisis. That includes properly funding proven tobacco prevention programs, as well as prohibiting the flavored products that have fueled this epidemic,” said Matthew L. Myers, President of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. “We need a comprehensive, all-hands-on-deck strategy to prevent e-cigarettes from addicting a generation of children.”

image

Overview

Criticism

Some anti-smoking advocates, such as William Godshall, have criticized the MSA as being too lenient on the major tobacco companies. In a speech at the National Tobacco Control Conference, Godshall stated that "[w]ith unprecedented future legal protection granted by the state A.G.s in exchange for money, it appears that the tobacco industry has emerged from the state lawsuits even more powerful".

History of adoption

In September 1950, an article was published in the British Medical Journal linking smoking to lung cancer and heart disease. In 1954 the British Doctors Study confirmed the suggestion, based on which the government issued advice that smoking and lung cancer rates were related. In 1964 the United States Surgeon General's Report on Smoking and Health likewise began suggesting the relatio…

Summary of terms

The Original Participating Manufacturers (OPMs) agreed to several broad categories of conditions:
• to restrict their advertising, sponsorship, lobbying, and litigation activities, particularly as those activities were seen as targeting youth;
• to disband three specific "Tobacco-Related Organizations," and to restrict their creation and participation in trade associations;

Contraband statutes

By the middle of 2000, domestic NPMs and importers had begun to obtain greater market share. The NAAG noted that reductions in settlement payments which result from an overall reduction in cigarette consumption benefit the states because health care costs imposed by each cigarette exceed the settlement payments. On the other hand, when reductions in settlement payments occur because NPM sales displace PM sales, the states receive no benefits if the NPMs do not …

Securitization

In the ten years following the settlement, many state and local governments have opted to sell so-called Tobacco Bonds. They are a form of securitization. In many cases the bonds permit state and local governments to transfer the risk of declines in future master settlement agreement payments to bondholders. In some cases, however, the bonds are backed by secondary pledges of state or local revenues, which creates what some see as a perverse incentive to support the to…

Individual state settlements

There is technically a distinct MSA signed separately with each state. While these MSAs are identical, the states have had to enact enabling legislation which differs from state to state. Furthermore, each state's court system is entitled to create its own jurisdictional interpretations of the MSA text. As a result, legal understanding of the MSA differ from state to state.
Documents relating to the initial lawsuits filed by each individual state are available at the UCSF

See also

• Operation Berkshire
• Project SCUM
• Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation
• "Truth" ad campaign

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9