How to Conduct Settlement Research Start on the Smart Search page. PRO TIP You may get better results by including the terms in the smart search bar rather than using the filters on the side column. A great feature available on Trellis when searching in the state of California is access to Tentative Rulings.
Full Answer
What does the global settlement mean for research analysts?
Research analysts will also be prohibited from going on pitches and roadshows with bankers during advertising and promotion of IPOs. Similarly, the Global Settlement also increased the IPO " quiet period " from 25 days to 40 days. Finally, research analyst's historical ratings must be disclosed and made available.
How much did the settlement cost the firms involved?
Other than these regulatory actions, the firms involved in the settlement have been required to pay fines to their investors, to fund investor education, and to pay for independent third-party market research. A total fine of $1.435 billion was assessed and is described in the table below.
What are the terms of the settlement?
Under the terms of the settlement, Respondents will pay a combined $115,000 in civil penalties to the United States, pay up to $30,000 in back pay to injured parties, train relevant human resources officials on avoiding discrimination in the employment eligibility verification process, and be subject to Division monitoring and reporting.
How do I negotiate a settlement?
Negotiate all of the terms of the settlement. It is best to come to an agreement on all, or nearly all, of the settlement terms. Don't leave a lot of threads hanging when you leave the bargaining table. Price might be most important to you, but there are other issues you need to reach agreement on.
How do you find settlements in Westlaw?
To access these databases, click Dockets, Trial Filings, and Jury Verdicts at the top of the page, then click a link, e.g., National Jury Verdicts, in the Jury Verdicts section.
How do you do a verdict search on Lexis?
To access it, click the menu button in the top left corner of the screen. Then select Verdict & Settlement Analyzer. You can search everything or narrow by jurisdiction, practice area, and date.
What is jury verdict Research?
Jury Verdicts/Settlements Verdict, as defined by Black's Law Dictionary, is "a jury's finding or decisions on the factual issue of a case. Loosely, in a nonjury trial, a judge and resolution of the issue of a case." (8th edition)
What is the largest amount ever awarded in a US civil case?
$206 billionThe Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (MSA): $206 billion The Tobacco MSA was entered into during November of 1998, and is the largest settlement in history.
Is LexisNexis available to the public?
LexisNexis provides its customers with access to a variety of publicly available information, public records, and non-public information.
What is LexisNexis used for?
LexisNexis® Risk Solutions provides customers with solutions and decision tools that combine public and industry specific content with advanced technology and analytics to assist them in evaluating and predicting risk and enhancing operational efficiency.
Why do juries give large awards?
It concluded that “jury verdicts influence the behavior of users of the civil justice system by helping to value future disputes and creating legal precedents … Juries decide cases totaling billions of dollars annually, and jury decisions set standards that influence social behavior.”
Is the jury's verdict final?
Criminal law In U.S. legal nomenclature, the verdict is the finding of the jury on the questions of fact submitted to it. Once the court (the judge) receives the verdict, the judge enters judgment on the verdict. The judgment of the court is the final order in the case.
What does a quick jury verdict usually mean?
Quick verdicts generally favor the defendant. As hours stretch on, it signals that jurors are taking evidence seriously and consider the evidence to have at least some validity. This deep study of verdicts says the reason that convictions often take longer is that the burden of proof is on the prosecution.
What happens if you win a civil suit?
When you "win" a civil case in court, the jury or judge may award you money damages. In some situations the losing party against whom there is a judgment (also known as a debtor), either refuses to follow the court order or cannot afford to pay the amount of the judgment.
What is the largest punitive damages ever awarded?
This award is historically significant for several reasons First, as already stated, the $28 billion in damages was the largest ever awarded to an individual plaintiff (in 2000, $145 billion in punitive damages was awarded by a Florida jury, but the case was a class-action with over 500,000 plaintiffs).
What is the biggest personal injury settlement?
Here are the Largest Personal Injury Settlements in US History$150 Billion For The Family of Robert Middleton. ... $4.9 Billion For The Anderson Family From General Motors. ... Gas Station Manager Awarded $60 Million After Suffering Brain Injuries Caused by Derailed Train. ... Ford Motor Co.More items...•
How do I use Lexis public records?
LexisNexis® Public Records can be accessed 2 different ways:Select Public Records from the product selector grid in the top left corner of the page.Click Public Records under Explore > Content on the home page. Note: Public Records opens in a new browser tab or window when you click the link from Explore.
Where can I access LexisNexis?
Use of this trial ID is limited to the individual user only and is subject to LexisNexis General Terms and Conditions located at http://www.lexisnexis.com/terms/general.aspx.
How do I block LexisNexis?
Request Your Security Freeze by Phone You can request your security freeze via phone at 1-800-456-1244.
What is the settlement agreement with National Systems America?
On January 14, 2021, the Division signed a settlement agreement with National Systems America, LP (NSA) to resolve claims based on its independent investigation into whether the company engaged in discrimination based on citizenship status in the hiring and employment eligibility verification processes in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B) and (a) (6). The company recruits employees using a foreign company as its agent, and directly hires them to perform IT work for NSA clients. IER’s investigation concluded that the company (1) engaged in a pattern or practice of recruiting and hiring only U.S. citizens or U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents for certain positions without legal justification, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B); and (2) on numerous occasions, requested copies of Permanent Resident Cards to confirm the citizenship status and work authorization of candidates who identified themselves as lawful permanent residents during the applicant screening process, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (6). Under the settlement agreement, the company will pay a civil penalty of $34,200 to the United States and train its employees on the requirements of the INA’s anti-discrimination provision, and be subject to departmental reporting requirements.
What is the settlement agreement with Chancery Staffing?
On February 18, 2020, the Division signed a settlement agreement with Chancery Staffing Solutions LLC, aka TransPerfect Staffing Solutions , a legal staffing company headquartered in New York, NY. The Division had previously filed a lawsuit in May 2019 alleging that from at least April 4, 2017 to at least July 7, 2017, the company (while operating as TransPerfect Staffing), had implemented a client directive restricting its recruitment and hiring of attorneys for a document review project to U.S. citizens only, and later, to U.S. citizens without dual citizenship. Under the settlement agreement, Chancery Staffing will pay a civil penalty of $27,000, provide back pay to victims identified during the term of the settlement agreement, and participate in Division-provided training on the anti-discrimination provision contained in 8 U.S.C. § 1324b. Chancery Staffing will also obtain supporting documentation from clients that request a citizenship status restriction when staffing a project to help ensure that any such restriction is lawful.
What is the complaint against Chancery Staffing Solutions LLC?
On May 9, 2019, the Division filed a complaint with the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer against Chancery Staffing Solutions LLC, a temporary staffing agency, alleging that the company is responsible for a pattern or practice of citizenship status discrimination in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1). Chancery Staffing is the successor to TransPerfect Staffing Solutions LLC and continues to do business as both TransPerfect Staffing Solutions and TransPerfect Legal Solutions. The lawsuit alleges that from at least April 4, 2017, to at least July 7, 2017, TransPerfect Staffing Solutions LLC discriminated against non-U.S. citizens and dual U.S. citizens in staffing a temporary document review project for a client, and that Chancery Staffing Solutions LLC is liable for the discrimination as its successor.
What is the settlement agreement with Adaequare?
(Adaequare) to resolve an independent investigation into whether the company engaged in citizenship or immigration status discrimination in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B). IER’s investigation concluded that the company, which recruits workers for other entities, engaged in discrimination in the hiring or recruitment/referral for a fee processes by considering only applicants who were U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents when filling a job for a client. Under the settlement agreement, the company will pay a civil penalty to the United States, train its employees on anti-discrimination obligations, and be subject to departmental reporting requirements.
What was the settlement agreement with Tuscany Hotel and Casino?
On October 10, 2012, the Department of Justice issued a press release announcing a settlement agreement with Tuscany Hotel and Casino resolving a lawsuit alleging the company discriminated against certain non-U.S. citizen s during the employment eligibility verification and reverification processes by requesting those individuals to provide more or different documents or information than required under Form I-9 rules based on their citizenship status. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Tuscany agreed to pay a civil penalty of $49,000 to the government and full back pay to an economic victim. Tuscany will also receive OSC-sponsored training regarding the anti-discrimination provision of the INA, be subject to reporting and monitoring requirements, and will revise its employment eligibility verification procedures.
When did ChemArt settle?
ChemArt (Unfair Documentary Practices and Retaliation) June 2020. On June 3, 2020, IER signed a settlement agreement with ChemArt, a Rhode Island manufacturing company, resolving claims that the company discriminated against a worker during the employment eligibility verification process and then retaliated against her.
What is the Ikon settlement agreement?
On December 8, 2020, the Division signed a settlement agreement with Ikon Systems , LLC , resolving claims that Ikon routinely discriminated against U.S. workers (U.S. citizens, U.S. nationals, recent lawful permanent residents , asylees, and refugees) by posting job advertisements specifying a preference for applicants with temporary work visas, and that Ikon failed to consider at least one U.S. citizen applicant who applied to a discriminatory advertisement. Specifically, IER’s investigation found that from at least May 8, 2019, to September 21, 2019, Ikon posted at least eight job advertisements for information technology (“IT”) positions that solicited applications from non-U.S. citizens with immigration statuses associated with certain employment-based visas and, in so doing, harmed U.S. workers by unlawfully deterring or failing to fairly consider them for hire, including the Charging Party. Under the agreement, Ikon will pay a civil penalty of $27,000 to the United States, revise its policies and procedures, train relevant employees and agents on the requirements of the INA’s anti-discrimination provision, and be subject to departmental reporting requirements during the agreement’s two-year term. Separately, Ikon will pay the $15,000 to the Charging Party.
How to find out what terms are typically negotiated in a settlement?
To find out what terms are typically negotiated in a settlement, you should research sample settlement agreements. You can often find these online.
Why is it important to negotiate a settlement?
Negotiating a settlement is a great way to avoid the uncertainty and expense of a lawsuit. Not only do lawsuits take a lot of time to resolve, but there is no guarantee that you will win once it is all over. Accordingly, you could settle the dispute and come out feeling good with the resolution. Almost 95% of all civil lawsuits settle.
Why is a walkaway point close to your best case scenario?
In this case, your walkaway point would be close to your best-case scenario because you have little to lose if settlement negotiations fail. By contrast, your BANTA might look terrible to you. For example, your best alternative to settlement might be to defend yourself in a lawsuit. But your evidence might be weak.
What is the purpose of negotiation?
The purpose of negotiation is compromise: you give something up to get something in return. Nevertheless, come up with a best-case scenario that is realistic. For example, if you are negotiating a debt settlement, then having your lender forgive 75% of the debt could be a best-case scenario.
What to do when you extend a counteroffer?
When you extend your counteroffer, make sure to justify it. Don't just throw out a number . Instead, explain to the other side why you are entitled to your counteroffer. If you are negotiating a settlement in a personal injury lawsuit, then you should talk about your pain and suffering when you make your counteroffer.
What are some examples of settlement agreements?
For example, you could settle debt, a personal injury lawsuit, or a boundary dispute involving your property. You can also negotiate severance packages when you leave a company and property division when you get divorced.
What to do if you owe money and you can't get credit?
Look at your evidence and assess how strong it is. If you owe money, then the best alternative might be to declare bankruptcy. Read up about bankruptcy's negatives. For example, although you can wipe out certain unsecured debt (like credit cards), you might not be able to get credit for several years afterwards.
What is the VerdictSearch Research Group?
Our trusted VerdictSearch Research Group will help you quickly receive the case-winning information you need. Our experts are skilled in how to extract the precise information needed to give you an edge over your competition.
What makes a juror sympathetic to one plaintiff?
Screening jurors is a delicate process that involves myriad factors. A trait that makes a juror sympathetic to one plaintiff may very well count against another plaintiff. One fairly consistent trait is economic background. Quite simply, wealthy jurors tend to favor defendants, while low-earning jurors tend to favor plaintiffs. Need specifics? The accompanying chart, based on cases reported to VerdictSearch in California, Florida, New York and Texas, shows that plaintiffs generally have the best chance of winning when their case is heard by jurors from areas in which the average annual per capita income is less than $20,000 (red bars on the a ...Show More
What is an addendum for research?
Answer: Addendum A permits certain communications to occur between Research and Investment Banking so long as they are effected through Research Management or are made in the presence of internal legal or compliance staff (a "chaperone"). Trained internal legal or compliance personnel that are dedicated to the Research department may perform chaperoning. We believe that it would not be inconsistent with the Addendum if legal or compliance personnel within the firm (such as control room personnel), properly trained specifically regarding Research and Investment Banking conflicts and the terms of the Addendum, act as chaperones. However, legal or compliance personnel that are primarily engaged in supporting the firm's investment banking department may not perform chaperoning.
How long are independent research ratings?
You requested clarification regarding the twelve months of Independent Research ratings and Settling Firms' ratings disclosures that would be required on a "Qualifying Website." The Addendum permits that, in certain contexts, the disclosure of ratings information may be made on a Qualifying Website instead of on a confirmation or periodic account statement. Such website must, among other things, display the ratings contained in each research report over the past twelve months. This twelve-month history will build-up over the course of the initial twelve months after the firm's obligations to procure and make available Independent Research under Section III are effective, and adjust on a rolling basis thereafter. Therefore, we would expect that on December 31, 2004, the ratings information displayed on the Qualifying Website must cover the period from July 27, 2004 through December 31, 2004.
What is Section I.7?
Answer: (a) Section I.7 permits Investment Banking input into category-by-category coverage decisions. Thus, Investment Banking management and Research Management may communicate with each other regarding category-by-category coverage decisions contemplated in Section I.7 of Addendum A. These communications regarding category-by-category coverage decisions may involve discussions of individual companies to the extent necessary to have a discussion about a category. We note that Section I.7 prohibits Research Management and Investment Banking management from communicating with each other regarding company-specific coverage decisions.
Does Section I.9 of the Addendum prohibit research involvement in efforts to solicit investment banking business?
Answer: No. Section I.9 of Addendum A prohibits Research involvement in efforts to solicit investment banking business (i.e. "pitches"). In the context of a solicitation of investment banking business, we believe it would be inconsistent with the objectives of Section I.9 of the Addendum to include any information regarding any research analyst employed by the firm or their views in a pitch book or other presentation materials.
Does the Addendum address research?
Answer: The Addendum does not generally address Research communications with issuers. However, Section I.9 of the Addendum prohibits Research from having any communication with companies for the purpose of soliciting investment banking business. Investment Banking personnel must not be present during, or participate in, any communications between Research and an issuer.
Can non-ECM investment banking personnel communicate with each other?
Answer: No. Non-ECM Investment Banking personnel and Research personnel may not communicate with each other regarding the preparation of internal-use memoranda and other efforts to educate the sales force.
Can an analyst contact an investment bank?
Investment Banking may not contact an analyst to give notice of a potential call from an issuer.
How to complement your research?
Acknowledge how your work complements others’ research. Take every opportunity you can in your research statement to point out areas where the work being done at the institution you’re applying to is similar to your own research. This will indicate to your reviewers that you’ve researched the institution and you’ve actually thought about your future there.
How to write a research statement?
Ask yourself what the major themes or questions in your research are. Outline the main questions that drive your research and that you strive to answer. Write these questions and topics down so that you’ll be better able to articulate them in your research statement.
How to write an executive summary for a research paper?
Put an executive summary in the first section. Write 1-2 paragraphs that include a summary of your research agenda and its main focus, any publications you have, your plans for future research, and your ultimate career goals. Place these paragraphs at the very beginning of your research statement. Treat this section as a concise summary of the things you plan to talk about in the rest of the statement.
Why is it important to make a research statement?
Because the research statement introduces you as a researcher to the people reviewing your job application, it’s important to make the statement as impressive as possible.
How to write a sentence for a research project?
For example, if your research focuses on the history of Philadelphia, add a sentence to the paragraph on your future research projects that says, “I believe based on my work that I would be a very strong candidate to receive a Balch Fellowship from the Historical Society of Pennsylvania.”
What to do if you have a trusted friend?
If you have trusted friends or colleagues in fields other than your own, ask them to read your statement for you to make sure you don’t use any words or concepts that they can’t understand.
Why do you write an executive summary after the other sections?
Because this section summarizes the rest of your research statement, you may want to write the executive summary after you’ve written the other sections first.
When was the Global Analyst Research Settlement?
Jump to navigation Jump to search. The Global Analyst Research Settlement was an enforcement agreement reached in the United States on April 28, 2003, between the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (NASD), New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), and ten of the United States 's largest investment ...
When was the settlement decision published?
As part of the settlement decision published on December 20, 2002, several regulations designed to prevent the abuse stemming from pressure by investment bankers on analysts to provide "favorable" appraisals were instantiated.
What was the conflict of interest between the investment banking and analysis departments of ten of the largest investment firms in the United?
The investment firms involved in the settlement had all engaged in actions and practices that had allowed the inappropriate influence of their research analysts by their investment bankers seeking lucrative fees. A typical violation addressed by the settlement was the case of CSFB and Salomon Smith Barney, which were alleged to have engaged in inappropriate spinning of "hot" initial public offerings (IPOs) and issued fraudulent research reports in violation of various sections within the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Similarly, UBS Warburg and Piper Jaffray were alleged to have received payments for investment research without disclosing such payments in violation of the Securities Act of 1933 .
What was the CSFB case?
A typical violation addressed by the settlement was the case of CSFB and Salomon Smith Barney, which were alleged to have engaged in inappropriate spinning of "hot" initial public offerings (IPOs) and issued fraudulent research reports in violation of various sections within the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
