Settlement FAQs

is there a law suit settlement againstlights of america

by Al Bailey Published 3 years ago Updated 2 years ago
image

A federal court ordered the company to pay money to the FTC to provide refunds and banned the defendants from misrepresenting material facts about lighting products. The FTC has mailed more than $15 million in refunds to date.

Why are there so many lawsuits against Bank of America?

Over the years Bank of America has faced a range of scandals and allegations, receiving backlash from both existing and potential customers, who claim to have been victims of misconduct. As a result, countless lawsuits and class action lawsuits have been filed following allegations surrounding the bank’s operations.

Can I participate in a cable installers'class action lawsuit?

If you work in California and you're required to use your own phone or tablet for work, you may be able to participate in a class action lawsuit. Class action lawsuits are now being filed on behalf of cable installers and cable repair workers who say they're not being paid properly.

Is there a class action lawsuit for the Elly oil rig?

A class action lawsuit has been filed alleging that the owners and operators of the Elly oil rig that spilled more than 140,000 gallons of oil into the Pacific Ocean acted negligently and are now responsible for the harm California residents and businesses have suffered.

Why are lawsuits being filed against Elmiron?

Lawsuits are now being filed on behalf of Elmiron patients who suffered permanent retinal injuries and seek to recover money for physical and mental anguish, medical expenses and more. The suits allege that the drug is defective and unreasonably dangerous and was not adequately labeled to warn both patients and doctors of its risks.

image

What is the settlement agreement with National Systems America?

On January 14, 2021, the Division signed a settlement agreement with National Systems America, LP (NSA) to resolve claims based on its independent investigation into whether the company engaged in discrimination based on citizenship status in the hiring and employment eligibility verification processes in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B) and (a) (6). The company recruits employees using a foreign company as its agent, and directly hires them to perform IT work for NSA clients. IER’s investigation concluded that the company (1) engaged in a pattern or practice of recruiting and hiring only U.S. citizens or U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents for certain positions without legal justification, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B); and (2) on numerous occasions, requested copies of Permanent Resident Cards to confirm the citizenship status and work authorization of candidates who identified themselves as lawful permanent residents during the applicant screening process, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (6). Under the settlement agreement, the company will pay a civil penalty of $34,200 to the United States and train its employees on the requirements of the INA’s anti-discrimination provision, and be subject to departmental reporting requirements.

What was the Whiz lawsuit?

On May 30, 2012, the Department of Justice settled a lawsuit against Whiz International LLC (Whiz), an information technology staffing company, resolving allegations that the company discriminated against one of its employees when it terminated her in retaliation for expressing opposition to its alleged preference for foreign nationals with temporary work visas. Under the terms of the settlement, Whiz agreed to pay $21,870 in back pay/front pay to the terminated worker, $1,000 in civil penalties to the United States Treasury, and three years of monitoring and reporting requirements. Whiz will also undergo training by the Department of Justice and has agreed not to discriminate against any employee on the basis of national origin or citizenship status.

What is the complaint against Chancery Staffing Solutions LLC?

On May 9, 2019, the Division filed a complaint with the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer against Chancery Staffing Solutions LLC, a temporary staffing agency, alleging that the company is responsible for a pattern or practice of citizenship status discrimination in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1). Chancery Staffing is the successor to TransPerfect Staffing Solutions LLC and continues to do business as both TransPerfect Staffing Solutions and TransPerfect Legal Solutions. The lawsuit alleges that from at least April 4, 2017, to at least July 7, 2017, TransPerfect Staffing Solutions LLC discriminated against non-U.S. citizens and dual U.S. citizens in staffing a temporary document review project for a client, and that Chancery Staffing Solutions LLC is liable for the discrimination as its successor.

What is the settlement agreement with Adaequare?

(Adaequare) to resolve an independent investigation into whether the company engaged in citizenship or immigration status discrimination in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B). IER’s investigation concluded that the company, which recruits workers for other entities, engaged in discrimination in the hiring or recruitment/referral for a fee processes by considering only applicants who were U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents when filling a job for a client. Under the settlement agreement, the company will pay a civil penalty to the United States, train its employees on anti-discrimination obligations, and be subject to departmental reporting requirements.

What is the settlement agreement with Chancery Staffing?

On February 18, 2020, the Division signed a settlement agreement with Chancery Staffing Solutions LLC, aka TransPerfect Staffing Solutions , a legal staffing company headquartered in New York, NY. The Division had previously filed a lawsuit in May 2019 alleging that from at least April 4, 2017 to at least July 7, 2017, the company (while operating as TransPerfect Staffing), had implemented a client directive restricting its recruitment and hiring of attorneys for a document review project to U.S. citizens only, and later, to U.S. citizens without dual citizenship. Under the settlement agreement, Chancery Staffing will pay a civil penalty of $27,000, provide back pay to victims identified during the term of the settlement agreement, and participate in Division-provided training on the anti-discrimination provision contained in 8 U.S.C. § 1324b. Chancery Staffing will also obtain supporting documentation from clients that request a citizenship status restriction when staffing a project to help ensure that any such restriction is lawful.

What is the Facebook lawsuit?

citizens, U.S. nationals, refugees, asylees, and recent lawful permanent residents) in its recruitment and hiring practices, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1). The lawsuit alleges that Facebook routinely refused to recruit, consider, or hire U.S. workers for positions that it reserved for temporary visa holders in connection with the permanent labor certification process (“PERM”). The complaint alleges that beginning no later than January 1, 2018 and lasting until at least September 18, 2019, Facebook used recruiting methods designed to deter U.S. workers from applying to positions reserved for temporary visa holders, refused to consider U.S. workers who applied to the positions, and hired only temporary visa holders for the positions.

What was the settlement agreement with Tuscany Hotel and Casino?

On October 10, 2012, the Department of Justice issued a press release announcing a settlement agreement with Tuscany Hotel and Casino resolving a lawsuit alleging the company discriminated against certain non-U.S. citizen s during the employment eligibility verification and reverification processes by requesting those individuals to provide more or different documents or information than required under Form I-9 rules based on their citizenship status. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Tuscany agreed to pay a civil penalty of $49,000 to the government and full back pay to an economic victim. Tuscany will also receive OSC-sponsored training regarding the anti-discrimination provision of the INA, be subject to reporting and monitoring requirements, and will revise its employment eligibility verification procedures.

What is the Elmiron Maculopathy lawsuit?

Elmiron Maculopathy Lawsuit. Lawsuits are now being filed on behalf of Elmiron patients who suffered permanent retinal injuries and seek to recover money for physical and mental anguish, medical expenses and more.

What is class action.org?

If you had a problem with your credit report, attorneys working with ClassAction.org may be able to help. They're offering to review people's credit reports, free of charge, to help determine whether the company that ran or ordered the report broke the law.

What are the attorneys investigating?

Attorneys are investigating whether consumers are being charged illegal and hidden fees on foreign payment card transactions. If so, they may be able to get a class action lawsuit started to help those affected.

Why are California employers being sued?

A number of companies have been sued in California for failing to provide their workers with accurate wage statements. The lawsuits claim the paystubs were missing important information – such as the total number of hours worked and hourly pay rates – and that this violates state labor law.

Why are Amazon delivery drivers sued?

A number of Amazon delivery drivers have sued the companies they work for, alleging that they’re not being paid properly.

What is a class action lawsuit against poultry processors?

A class action lawsuit has been filed alleging some of the largest poultry processors have engaged in a wage-fixing scheme that has suppressed the pay of plant workers for years. If you worked in a poultry plant at any time since 2009, it’s possible that you were underpaid as a result of this alleged conspiracy.

Is Zantac a class action lawsuit?

Class action lawsuits have been filed alleging that Zantac exposes users to unsafe levels of a probable carcinogen and that the manufacturers knew about the risk but failed to disclose it.

As part of the settlement, Bank of America agreed to stop charging customers for extended overdraft fees for at least five years

As a result of the Settlement, nearly six million customers will be reimbursed for the charges. The settlement is expected to save the bank about $1.2 billion in fees over the next five years. However, it is not clear exactly how much of this money will go to consumers, which is why a company’s financial records are so important.

The settlement is a great deal for customers

If you were charged an overdraft fee on a credit card payment from Bank of America, you could receive a payout. This money may help you overcome financial hardship. As with any class action, some deadlines must be met to exercise your options and rights. The Settlement page and Notice include information about these deadlines.

In this case, a woman filed a class-action lawsuit against Bank of America after her credit card was rejected

She was charged three $35 fees after her card was declined. This is an example of the type of overdraft fee that a consumer can receive for a debit card transaction. The settlement is worth $75 million and can be used for many other types of transactions. Although this is a substantial amount, it is still a substantial win for the bank.

How much did Transamerica settle?

Transamerica has agreed to a $5.4 million settlement with roughly 17,000 current and former employees in a lawsuit that accused the investment company of offering several poor performing options in its employee retirement plan

Does Transamerica have an outside investment consultant?

As part of the settlement, Transamerica also agreed hire an outside investment consultant to offer advice on its retirement plan options.

Slight exaggeration, which OAN is no doubt entirely comfortable with

One America Network (OAN) is facing one less lawsuit over its coverage of the 2020 election after airing this 30-second spot admitting that there was no vote fraud in Georgia.

6 Ways Firms Can Win With Legal Tech In An Uncertain Market

Now is the time to evaluate your firm’s technology strategy and reconfigure it for the future.

Amy Wax Is Back At It -- See Also

Amy Wax Has A New Boogeyman: Err, boogeywoman. She thinks women (but obvi not her!) at universities are a real problem.

image
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9