What happened to the tobacco Master Settlement Agreement money?
Up In Smoke: What Happened to the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement Money? In November 1998, forty-six US states, along with the District of Columbia and five US territories, and the major tobacco companies entered into a contract of an extraordinary nature.
What is the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA)?
The agreement, known as the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA), represented the culmination of a decades-long argument between the tobacco companies and state governments.
How much did Michigan receive from the tobacco settlement money?
^ "Since the MSA was adopted, the tobacco companies have paid a total of more than $138 billion, with Michigan receiving more than $5.9 billion". ^ "Tobacco Settlement Funds Sprinklers, Golf Carts and a Grease Trap". ^ "Who Is Really Benefiting From the Tobacco Settlement Money?".
How many claims does the settlement resolve?
The settlement resolves more than 4,000 claims of state and local governments across the country. It is the second-largest multistate agreement in U.S. history, second only to the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement.
Why did the OPMs and the settling states not join the MSA?
The OPMs worried that the NPMs, both because they would not be bound by the advertising and other restrictions in the MSA and because they would not be required to make payments to the settling states, would be able to charge lower prices for their cigarettes and thus increase their market share.
How long does it take for a SPM to join the Master Settlement Agreement?
As an incentive to join the Master Settlement Agreement, the agreement provides that, if an SPM joined within ninety days following the Master Settlement Agreement's "Execution Date," that SPM is exempt ("exempt SPM") from making annual payments to the settling states unless the SPM increases its share of the national cigarette market beyond its 1998 market share, or beyond 125% of that SPM's 1997 market share. If the exempt SPM's market share in a given year increases beyond those relevant historic limits, the MSA requires that the exempt SPM make annual payments to the settling states, similar to those made by the OPMs, but based only upon the SPM's sales representing the exempt SPM's market share increase.
What was the 1997 National Settlement Proposal?
This proposed congressional remedy (1997 National Settlement Proposal (NSP), a.k.a. the "June 20, 1997 Proposal") for the cigarette tobacco problem resembled the eventual Multistate Settlement Agreement (MSA), but with important differences. For example, although the congressional proposal would have earmarked one-third of all funds to combat teenage smoking, no such restrictions appear in the MSA. In addition, the congressional proposal would have mandated Food and Drug Administration oversight and imposed federal advertising restrictions. It also would have granted immunity from state prosecutions; eliminated punitive damages in individual tort suits; and prohibited the use of class actions, or other joinder or aggregation devices without the defendant's consent, assuring that only individual actions could be brought. The congressional proposal called for payments to the states of $368.5 billion over 25 years. By contrast, assuming that the Majors would maintain their market share, the MSA provides baseline payments of about $200 billion over 25 years. This baseline payment is subject to
How many plaintiffs have ever prevailed in the tobacco case?
Only two plaintiffs ever prevailed, and both of those decisions were reversed on appeal. As scientific evidence mounted in the 1980s, tobacco companies claimed contributory negligence as they asserted adverse health effects were previously unknown or lacked substantial credibility.
What did the Majors seek?
Faced with the prospect of defending multiple actions nationwide, the Majors sought a congressional remedy, primarily in the form of a national legislative settlement. In June 1997, the National Association of Attorneys General and the Majors jointly petitioned Congress for a global resolution.
How many lawsuits were filed against tobacco companies?
By the mid-1950s, individuals in the United States began to sue the companies responsible for manufacturing and marketing cigarettes for damages related to the effects of smoking. In the forty years through 1994, over 800 private claims were brought against tobacco companies in state courts across the country. The individuals asserted claims for negligent manufacture, negligent advertising, fraud, and violation of various state consumer protection statutes. The tobacco companies were successful against these lawsuits. Only two plaintiffs ever prevailed, and both of those decisions were reversed on appeal. As scientific evidence mounted in the 1980s, tobacco companies claimed contributory negligence as they asserted adverse health effects were previously unknown or lacked substantial credibility.
What is the tobacco master settlement agreement?
The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement ( MSA) was entered in November 1998, originally between the four largest United States tobacco companies ( Philip Morris Inc., R. J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson and Lorillard – the "original participating manufacturers", referred to as the "Majors") and the attorneys general of 46 states. The states settled their Medicaid lawsuits against the tobacco industry for recovery of their tobacco-related health-care costs. In exchange, the companies agreed to curtail or cease certain tobacco marketing practices, as well as to pay, in perpetuity, various annual payments to the states to compensate them for some of the medical costs of caring for persons with smoking-related illnesses. The money also funds a new anti-smoking advocacy group, called the Truth Initiative, that is responsible for such campaigns as Truth and maintains a public archive of documents resulting from the cases.
How do politicians take advantage of the tobacco industry?
Besides politicians’ quintessential habit of spending money on things it was not meant for, there is a more insidious way that they have taken advantage of the never-ending stream of money from the tobacco companies. This is called securitization, and it occurs when a cash-strapped state borrows against promised future MSA payments so that it can get the money immediately. The state issues bonds backed up by the promise of future payments. The term “tobacco bonds” is a reference to this irresponsible practice. The buyers of bonds (the most prominent of which are powerful financial institutions) make a handsome long-term profit. State governments and their taxpayers get a raw deal. As the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids warned as early as 2002, states that securitize their tobacco funds get much smaller total payments, “usually for about 40 cents on the dollar or less,” than they would if they let the future revenue come in as planned. Borrowing against future payments in exchange for less money today leads to fewer resources for public health and more money for Wall Street. Yet politicians openly turn to the MSA revenue to cover for their irresponsible spending. For example, in November 2017, as Pennsylvania tried to balance its budget shortfall that had been caused by a refusal to eliminate wasteful spending, securitizing tobacco settlement revenue was the preferred course of all parties. Unfortunately, even some otherwise fiscally responsible politicians like to securitize tobacco revenue, as they consider it a better option than raising taxes.
What was the master settlement agreement between the tobacco companies and the states?
In November 1998, forty-six US states, along with the District of Columbia and five US territories, and the major tobacco companies entered into a contract of an extraordinary nature. (The other four states, Florida, Minnesota, Mississippi, and Texas, had entered similar agreements on their own beginning the year before.) The agreement, known as the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA), represented the culmination of a decades-long argument between the tobacco companies and state governments. After the dangers of smoking became known, the tobacco industry had engaged in extensive efforts to somehow stay in business, deflect and defeat lawsuits, and minimize negative attention. Public healthcare systems—and most of the healthcare in this country is taxpayer-funded or subsidized—had seen an influx of patients with smoking-related diseases, and state governments began filing lawsuits against the tobacco companies, claiming they wanted money to help cover smoking-related healthcare costs. The tobacco companies had lots of money but were nervous about the states’ potential to sue them out of business. So, they decided to talk. The result was the MSA.
What is the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement?
The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement simultaneously represents one of the most egregious examples of a government shakedown of private industry and offers a case study of the problems that stem from big government and big business scratching each other’s backs. It has turned the largest tobacco companies into an indispensable cash cow for politicians and bureaucrats, enabled irresponsible state spending, and, amazingly, has resulted in less money for public health and tobacco control while propping up a declining industry. As is the case with discriminatory tobacco taxes, the incentives of the MSA are perverse: the more people smoke, the more money the government gets to spend on whatever it wants. The biggest losers are those with tobacco-related diseases and smokers trying to quit.
How does the amount paid by tobacco companies affect the number of cigarettes sold?
The amount paid by the tobacco companies would directly correlate to the number of cigarettes sold—the more cigarettes sold, the more money the states would get. In exchange for their money, the tobacco companies would not be sued by state and local governments seeking recovery of costs associated with tobacco use.
How much money did tobacco companies pay to the states?
Nearly twenty years later, the tobacco companies have paid a staggering $119.5 billion to the states and territories participating in the MSA and another $25.4 billion to the four states with their own agreements. What have the states done with this huge amount of money?
What is tobacco bonds?
The state issues bonds backed up by the promise of future payments. The term “tobacco bonds” is a reference to this irresponsible practice. The buyers of bonds (the most prominent of which are powerful financial institutions) make a handsome long-term profit. State governments and their taxpayers get a raw deal.
What are the incentives of the MSA?
As is the case with discriminatory tobacco taxes, the incentives of the MSA are perverse: the more people smoke, the more money the government gets to spend on whatever it wants. The biggest losers are those with tobacco-related diseases and smokers trying to quit.
What is the purpose of entering into agreements with major retail chains?
Entering into agreements with major retail chains to ensure that retailers comply with state laws setting the minimum age at which tobacco products may be purchased and limiting the quantity and content of tobacco advertising at retail locations.
How many tobacco companies have settled under the MSA?
Eventually, more than 45 tobacco companies settled with the Settling States under the MSA. Although Florida, Minnesota, Mississippi, and Texas are not signatories to the MSA, they have their own individual tobacco settlements, which occurred prior to the MSA.
How does MSA work?
The MSA’s purpose is to reduce smoking in the U.S., especially in youth, which is achieved through: 1 Raising the cost of cigarettes by imposing payment obligations on the tobacco companies party to the MSA. 2 Restricting tobacco advertising, marketing, and promotions, including:#N#Prohibiting tobacco companies from taking any action to target youth in the advertising, promotion or marketing of tobacco products.#N#Banning the use of cartoons in advertising, promotions, packaging, or labeling of tobacco products.#N#Prohibiting tobacco companies from distributing merchandise bearing the brand name of tobacco products.#N#Banning payments to promote tobacco products in media, such as movies, televisions shows, theater, music, and video games.#N#Prohibiting tobacco brand name sponsorship of events with a significant youth audience or team sports. 3 Eliminating tobacco company practices that obscure tobacco’s health risks. 4 Providing money for the Settling States that states may choose to use to fund smoking prevention programs. 5 Establishing and funding the Truth Initiative, an organization “dedicated to achieving a culture where all youth and young adults reject tobacco.”
How does the MSA affect smoking?
The MSA continues to have a profound effect on smoking in America, particularly among youth. Between 1998 and 2019 , U.S. cigarette consumption dropped by more than 50%. During that same time period, regular smoking by high schoolers dropped from its near peak of 36.4% in 1997 to a low 6.0% in 2019. As advocates for the public interest, state attorneys general are actively and successfully continuing to enforce the provisions of the MSA to reduce tobacco use and protect consumers.
What is the purpose of the MSA?
The MSA’s purpose is to reduce smoking in the U.S., especially in youth , which is achieved through: Raising the cost of cigarettes by imposing payment obligations on the tobacco companies party to the MSA.
Is the MSA subject to constitutional defenses?
Also, because the contractual requirements of the MSA are in some ways broader than the authority granted to the FDA and are not subject to constitutional defenses, state attorneys general continue to step in where the FDA may be unable to act.
Do tobacco companies have to pay settlements?
Under the MSA, tobacco manufacturers are obligated to make annual payments to the Settling States in perpetuity, so long as cigarettes are sold in the United States by companies that have settled with the States. The NAAG Center for Tobacco and Public Health makes certain such payments are made.
