The Master Settlement Agreement
Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement
The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement was entered in November 1998, originally between the four largest United States tobacco companies and the attorneys general of 46 states. The states settled their Medicaid lawsuits against the tobacco industry for recovery of their tobacco-related health-care costs. In exchange, the companies agreed to curtail or cease certain tobacco marketing practices, as w…
What is the tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (MSA)?
The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) | NAAG In 1998, 52 state and territory attorneys general signed the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) with the four largest tobacco companies in the U.S. to settle dozens of state lawsuits brought to recover billions of dollars in health care costs associated with treating smoking-related illnesses.
What was the Master Settlement Agreement of 1998?
The 1998 Master Settlement Agreement between the major tobacco companies, 46 U.S. states, the District of Columbia and five U.S. territories transformed tobacco control.
What does MSA stand for?
Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement. The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement ( MSA) was entered in November 1998, originally between the four largest United States tobacco companies ( Philip Morris Inc., R. J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson and Lorillard – the "original participating manufacturers", referred to as the "Majors")...
Who are the Subsequent Participating Manufacturers (SPMs)?
Since 1998, approximately 41 additional tobacco companies have joined the Master Settlement Agreement. These companies, referred to as the Subsequent Participating Manufacturers (SPMs), are bound by the Master Settlement Agreement's restrictions and must make payments to the settling states as set forth in the Master Settlement Agreement.
What states are part of the Master Settlement Agreement?
Adoption of the "Master Settlement Agreement" (Florida, Minnesota, Texas and Mississippi had already reached individual agreements with the tobacco industry.) The four manufacturers—Philip Morris USA, R. J.
When was the Master Settlement Agreement?
November 1998The tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) is an accord reached in November 1998 between the state Attorneys General of 46 states, five U.S. territories, the District of Columbia and the four largest cigarette manufacturers in the United States.
What is MSA reporting for tobacco?
MSA Multicat Mandatory Data Multicat reports are weekly reports filed electronically by tobacco, candy, drinks, and grocery distributors to report sales and inventory floor counts to brand manufacturers as part of participating in their trade programs.
What effect did the MSA settlement have on tobacco sold in the US?
The MSA continues to have a profound effect on smoking in America, particularly among youth. Between 1998 and 2019, U.S. cigarette consumption dropped by more than 50%. During that same time period, regular smoking by high schoolers dropped from its near peak of 36.4% in 1997 to a low 6.0% in 2019.
What did the Master Settlement Agreement accomplish?
It settled the state lawsuits that sought billions of dollars in costs associated with treating smoking-related illnesses. The Attorneys General of the 46 states, the District of Columbia and five U.S. territories signed the MSA with the four largest U.S. tobacco companies in 1998.
Where did the tobacco settlement money go?
This year (fiscal year 2020), the states will collect $27.2 billion from the 1998 tobacco settlement and tobacco taxes. But they will spend less than 3% – just $739.7 million – on programs to prevent kids from using tobacco and help smokers quit - less than a quarter (22.4%) of the total funding recommended by the CDC.
When did cigarette companies stop advertising on TV?
On April 1, 1970, President Richard Nixon signs legislation officially banning cigarette ads on television and radio. Nixon, who was an avid pipe smoker, indulging in as many as eight bowls a day, supported the legislation at the increasing insistence of public health advocates.
What is mainstream smoke?
(MAYN-streem ...) Tobacco smoke that is exhaled by smokers. Mainstream smoke can be a form of secondhand smoke. It contains nicotine and many harmful, cancer-causing chemicals. Inhaling mainstream smoke increases the risk of lung cancer and may increase the risk of other types of cancer.
What kinds of comparisons can you draw between vaping and smoking cigarettes?
Smoking. The difference between smoking and vaping is that smoking delivers nicotine by burning tobacco, which can cause smoking-related illnesses, and vaping can deliver nicotine by heating a liquid in a much less harmful way.
How have the tobacco companies responded to the tobacco settlement?
Tobacco manufacturers responded in full force, fighting each lawsuit and refusing to settle out of court.
Why was the tobacco industry sued?
The United States Justice Department has filed a massive civil lawsuit against the country's major tobacco companies, seeking to recover billions of dollars in long term costs related to treating ill smokers covered by the government health programmes.
How much was the 1998 tobacco settlement?
In 1998, state governments reached a 25-year, $246 billion deal with the country's largest tobacco companies. The staggering sum was intended to hold the industry accountable for the lethal effects of smoking and provide support for anti-tobacco programs.
What did the master settlement agreement that cigarette companies agreed to in 1998 do?
The Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) imposes major restrictions on tobacco company marketing practices and prohibits advertising aimed at youth. The MSA restricts the participating tobacco companies in the following ways: Prohibits direct or indirect targeting of youth in advertising, marketing and promotions.
What price did the tobacco companies have to pay for hiding the truth from consumers?
So far tobacco companies have paid more than $100 billion to state governments as part of the 25-year, $246 billion settlement. Among many state governments receiving money, Orange County, Calif., is an outlier.
What was the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement?
The 1998 Master Settlement Agreement between the major tobacco companies, 46 U.S. states, the District of Columbia and five U.S. territories transformed tobacco control. In the largest civil litigation settlement in U.S. history, the states and territories scored a victory that resulted in the tobacco companies paying the states ...
When did the MSA start?
The Attorneys General of the 46 states, the District of Columbia and five U.S. territories signed the MSA with the four largest U.S. tobacco companies in 1998.
Who was sued by the MSA?
territories in the mid-1990s against major U.S. cigarette manufacturers Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson and Lorillard, plus the tobacco industry's trade associations.
Does MSA include individual claims?
This did not include individual claims their citizens may have.
When was the Master Settlement Agreement signed?
Adoption of the "Master Settlement Agreement". In November 1998 , the Attorneys General of the remaining 46 states, as well as of the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands, entered into the Master Settlement Agreement with the four largest manufacturers of cigarettes in the United States.
How long does it take for a SPM to join the Master Settlement Agreement?
As an incentive to join the Master Settlement Agreement, the agreement provides that, if an SPM joined within ninety days following the Master Settlement Agreement's "Execution Date," that SPM is exempt ("exempt SPM") from making annual payments to the settling states unless the SPM increases its share of the national cigarette market beyond its 1998 market share, or beyond 125% of that SPM's 1997 market share. If the exempt SPM's market share in a given year increases beyond those relevant historic limits, the MSA requires that the exempt SPM make annual payments to the settling states, similar to those made by the OPMs, but based only upon the SPM's sales representing the exempt SPM's market share increase.
Why did the OPMs and the settling states not join the MSA?
The OPMs worried that the NPMs, both because they would not be bound by the advertising and other restrictions in the MSA and because they would not be required to make payments to the settling states, would be able to charge lower prices for their cigarettes and thus increase their market share.
What was the 1997 National Settlement Proposal?
This proposed congressional remedy (1997 National Settlement Proposal (NSP), a.k.a. the "June 20, 1997 Proposal") for the cigarette tobacco problem resembled the eventual Multistate Settlement Agreement (MSA), but with important differences. For example, although the congressional proposal would have earmarked one-third of all funds to combat teenage smoking, no such restrictions appear in the MSA. In addition, the congressional proposal would have mandated Food and Drug Administration oversight and imposed federal advertising restrictions. It also would have granted immunity from state prosecutions; eliminated punitive damages in individual tort suits; and prohibited the use of class actions, or other joinder or aggregation devices without the defendant's consent, assuring that only individual actions could be brought. The congressional proposal called for payments to the states of $368.5 billion over 25 years. By contrast, assuming that the Majors would maintain their market share, the MSA provides baseline payments of about $200 billion over 25 years. This baseline payment is subject to
How many lawsuits were filed against tobacco companies?
By the mid-1950s, individuals in the United States began to sue the companies responsible for manufacturing and marketing cigarettes for damages related to the effects of smoking. In the forty years through 1994, over 800 private claims were brought against tobacco companies in state courts across the country. The individuals asserted claims for negligent manufacture, negligent advertising, fraud, and violation of various state consumer protection statutes. The tobacco companies were successful against these lawsuits. Only two plaintiffs ever prevailed, and both of those decisions were reversed on appeal. As scientific evidence mounted in the 1980s, tobacco companies claimed contributory negligence as they asserted adverse health effects were previously unknown or lacked substantial credibility.
What is the tobacco master settlement agreement?
The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement ( MSA) was entered in November 1998, originally between the four largest United States tobacco companies ( Philip Morris Inc., R. J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson and Lorillard – the "original participating manufacturers", referred to as the "Majors") and the attorneys general of 46 states. The states settled their Medicaid lawsuits against the tobacco industry for recovery of their tobacco-related health-care costs. In exchange, the companies agreed to curtail or cease certain tobacco marketing practices, as well as to pay, in perpetuity, various annual payments to the states to compensate them for some of the medical costs of caring for persons with smoking-related illnesses. The money also funds a new anti-smoking advocacy group, called the Truth Initiative, that is responsible for such campaigns as Truth and maintains a public archive of documents resulting from the cases.
Who are the original participating manufacturers in the MSA?
The four manufacturers— Philip Morris USA, R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., and Lorillard Tobacco Company —are referred to in the MSA as the Original Participating Manufacturers (OPMs). This settlement process yielded two other national agreements:
Master Settlement Agreement Fact Sheet
The Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) imposes major restrictions on tobacco company marketing practices and prohibits advertising aimed at youth. The MSA restricts the participating tobacco companies in the following ways:
Smokeless Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement
The Smokeless Master Settlement Agreement details the financial settlement and restrictions smokeless tobacco products, including chewing tobacco.
What is MSA settlement?
A: The MSA set up initial, annual, and “strategic contribution” payments from Participating Manufacturers to the Settling States. Each year, an independent auditor calculates the settlement payment to be made by each Participating Manufacturer and the amount to be received by each Settling State.18 If parties disagree with the auditor’s calculations, the matter is submitted to binding arbitration by three neutral arbitrators who must be former federal judges.19
What is the MSA?
] The MSA created the American Legacy Foundation (now known as the Truth Initiative), a research and educational organization that focuses its efforts on preventing teen smoking and encouraging smokers to quit. The foundation is responsible for “The Truth” advertisement campaign,30 which has had success in reducing youth smoking.31
What is the purpose of Section VII of the MSA?
A: Under Section VII of the MSA, each Settling State may bring an action to enforce the Agreement or the Consent Decree (the settlement contained in a court order) with respect to disputes or alleged breaches within its territory. The court that entered a Settling State’s Consent Decree has exclusive jurisdiction to implement and enforce the MSA with respect to that state. Section VIII(a) of the MSA places responsibility on the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) to coordinate and facilitate the MSA’s implementation and enforcement on behalf of the attorneys general of the Settling States . NAAG carries out this mandate through an attorney general-level Tobacco Committee and an Enforcement Working Group, which consists of attorney general office staff working on tobacco issues, and the NAAG Tobacco Project, which is comprised of staff attorneys within NAAG who support state enforcement efforts. (The NAAG Tobacco Project is now known as the NAAG Center for Tobacco and Public Health.) Enforcement typically begins when a state attorney general office or NAAG observes a potential violation of the MSA, or a member of the public or a public organization complains about a Participating Manufacturer’s marketing practices to a state attorney general or NAAG. If the matter is not resolved through negotiation, one or more Settling States may decide to bring an enforcement action against the Participating Manufacturer.
What is MSA in manufacturing?
A: The MSA is a settlement agreement between the Settling States, the Original Participating Manufacturers, and the Subsequent Participating Manufacturers.13 The number of Participating Manufacturers remains fluid as, over the years, some additional manufacturers have settled with the states and others have gone out of business. As of October 2018, there are more than 50 Participating Manufacturers who are bound by the terms of the MSA.14
Does the MSA limit how the settlement states use their funds?
A: As noted above, the MSA does not limit how the Settling States may use their funds. Some state and local governments have securitized their future MSA payments in which they issue a bond backed by future payments. In other words, “By securitizing … the state trades a potentially risky future stream of payments for a certain lump-sum payment,” often to generate short-term cash to cover budget shortfalls.58 Securing bonds has allowed state governments to finance capital improvements, fund health-care projects, and receive an upfront lump sum of cash rather than waiting each year for the MSA payments.59 By 2010, eighteen states, the District of Columbia, and three U.S. territories securitized some or all of their revenue entitlements from the MSA payment schedule into bonds.60 The issued bonds totaled $40 billion and are backed by expected future MSA payments.61
Overview
The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) was entered on November 23, 1998, originally between the four largest United States tobacco companies (Philip Morris Inc., R. J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson and Lorillard – the "original participating manufacturers", referred to as the "Majors") and the attorneys general of 46 states. The states settled their Medicaid lawsuits against the tobacco industry for recovery of their tobacco-related health-care costs. In exchange, the compa…
History of adoption
In September 1950, an article was published in the British Medical Journal linking smoking to lung cancer and heart disease. In 1954 the British Doctors Study confirmed the suggestion, based on which the government issued advice that smoking and lung cancer rates were related. In 1964 the United States Surgeon General's Report on Smoking and Health likewise began suggesting the relatio…
Summary of terms
The Original Participating Manufacturers (OPMs) agreed to several broad categories of conditions:
• to restrict their advertising, sponsorship, lobbying, and litigation activities, particularly as those activities were seen as targeting youth;
• to disband three specific "Tobacco-Related Organizations," and to restrict their creation and participation in trade associations;
Contraband statutes
By the middle of 2000, domestic NPMs and importers had begun to obtain greater market share. The NAAG noted that reductions in settlement payments which result from an overall reduction in cigarette consumption benefit the states because health care costs imposed by each cigarette exceed the settlement payments. On the other hand, when reductions in settlement payments occur because NPM sales displace PM sales, the states receive no benefits if the NPMs do not …
Criticism
Some anti-smoking advocates, such as William Godshall, have criticized the MSA as being too lenient on the major tobacco companies. In a speech at the National Tobacco Control Conference, Godshall stated that "[w]ith unprecedented future legal protection granted by the state A.G.s in exchange for money, it appears that the tobacco industry has emerged from the state lawsuits even more powerful".
Securitization
In the ten years following the settlement, many state and local governments have opted to sell so-called Tobacco Bonds. They are a form of securitization. In many cases the bonds permit state and local governments to transfer the risk of declines in future master settlement agreement payments to bondholders. In some cases, however, the bonds are backed by secondary pledges of state or local revenues, which creates what some see as a perverse incentive to support the to…
Individual state settlements
There is technically a distinct MSA signed separately with each state. While these MSAs are identical, the states have had to enact enabling legislation which differs from state to state. Furthermore, each state's court system is entitled to create its own jurisdictional interpretations of the MSA text. As a result, legal understanding of the MSA differ from state to state.
Documents relating to the initial lawsuits filed by each individual state are available at the UCSF
See also
• Operation Berkshire
• Project SCUM
• Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation
• "Truth" ad campaign