Full Answer
Where is DT9?
DT9 spans the counties of Dorset and Somerset. It contains the town of Sherborne, as well as Yetminster, Milborne Port, Longburton, Leigh, and Chetnole. DT9 is 31km south of the city of Wells. DT9 is a postcode district, also known as an outcode or outbound code.
Is DT9 responsible for any delays in the payment of commissions?
DT9 cannot be held responsible in any way for any delays in the payment of commissions. All commissions generated are subject to the final approval of the Operators and, once confirmed and paid to DT9, will become available to the Affiliates.
What is DT9’s policy on affiliates?
DT9 may refuse membership as an Affiliate of any Company or close the Affiliate’s account, in the event that, in its sole discretion, the conduct of the Company requesting the affiliation or of the Affiliate is contrary to the law, or may harm the interests of DT9. DT9 must approve all the Operator’s programs and services used by the Affiliate.
What is a settlement administrator website?
Most Settlement Administrators create a special, court-approved website to serve as a hub for information about the case, including court documents and updates about when payments will be distributed. Settlement Administrator websites also provide a way for Class Members to electronically file their Claim Forms.
DT9 on a map
The below map shows where DT9 is, and the boundary of the DT9 postcode district:
What county is DT9 in?
DT9 lies within the counties of Dorset and Somerset. The below table and chart shows the split by area:
What are the nearest towns to DT9?
Position of DT9 relative to nearby towns. Distance is measured from the centre of DT9 to the centre of the town.
What are the nearest cities to DT9?
Position of DT9 relative to nearby cities. Distance is measured from the centre of DT9 to the centre of the city.
What is NCDS arbitration?
NCDS, as contracted by the Class Action Settlement Administrator (SA), provides binding arbitration case management of Class Member reimbursement claims that were denied by the SA . The authority of NCDS, as it relates specifically to case administration functions, is prescribed in the Rules. In its capacity as administrator, NCDS is not authorized to make decisions with respect to the merits of any case, nor offer advice or suggestions on how to resolve a case. NCDS serves to facilitate the case administration process by appointing arbitrators, transmitting information between the parties, and arranging for the arbitration hearing.
What is the role of NCDS?
NCDS serves to facilitate the case administration process by appointing arbitrators, transmitting information between the parties, and arranging for the arbitration hearing.
What is the settlement agreement with Adaequare?
(Adaequare) to resolve an independent investigation into whether the company engaged in citizenship or immigration status discrimination in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B). IER’s investigation concluded that the company, which recruits workers for other entities, engaged in discrimination in the hiring or recruitment/referral for a fee processes by considering only applicants who were U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents when filling a job for a client. Under the settlement agreement, the company will pay a civil penalty to the United States, train its employees on anti-discrimination obligations, and be subject to departmental reporting requirements.
What is the settlement agreement with National Systems America?
On January 14, 2021, the Division signed a settlement agreement with National Systems America, LP (NSA) to resolve claims based on its independent investigation into whether the company engaged in discrimination based on citizenship status in the hiring and employment eligibility verification processes in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B) and (a) (6). The company recruits employees using a foreign company as its agent, and directly hires them to perform IT work for NSA clients. IER’s investigation concluded that the company (1) engaged in a pattern or practice of recruiting and hiring only U.S. citizens or U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents for certain positions without legal justification, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (1) (B); and (2) on numerous occasions, requested copies of Permanent Resident Cards to confirm the citizenship status and work authorization of candidates who identified themselves as lawful permanent residents during the applicant screening process, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (a) (6). Under the settlement agreement, the company will pay a civil penalty of $34,200 to the United States and train its employees on the requirements of the INA’s anti-discrimination provision, and be subject to departmental reporting requirements.
What is the settlement agreement with Chancery Staffing?
On February 18, 2020, the Division signed a settlement agreement with Chancery Staffing Solutions LLC, aka TransPerfect Staffing Solutions , a legal staffing company headquartered in New York, NY. The Division had previously filed a lawsuit in May 2019 alleging that from at least April 4, 2017 to at least July 7, 2017, the company (while operating as TransPerfect Staffing), had implemented a client directive restricting its recruitment and hiring of attorneys for a document review project to U.S. citizens only, and later, to U.S. citizens without dual citizenship. Under the settlement agreement, Chancery Staffing will pay a civil penalty of $27,000, provide back pay to victims identified during the term of the settlement agreement, and participate in Division-provided training on the anti-discrimination provision contained in 8 U.S.C. § 1324b. Chancery Staffing will also obtain supporting documentation from clients that request a citizenship status restriction when staffing a project to help ensure that any such restriction is lawful.
What was the settlement agreement with Tuscany Hotel and Casino?
On October 10, 2012, the Department of Justice issued a press release announcing a settlement agreement with Tuscany Hotel and Casino resolving a lawsuit alleging the company discriminated against certain non-U.S. citizen s during the employment eligibility verification and reverification processes by requesting those individuals to provide more or different documents or information than required under Form I-9 rules based on their citizenship status. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Tuscany agreed to pay a civil penalty of $49,000 to the government and full back pay to an economic victim. Tuscany will also receive OSC-sponsored training regarding the anti-discrimination provision of the INA, be subject to reporting and monitoring requirements, and will revise its employment eligibility verification procedures.
When did ChemArt settle?
ChemArt (Unfair Documentary Practices and Retaliation) June 2020. On June 3, 2020, IER signed a settlement agreement with ChemArt, a Rhode Island manufacturing company, resolving claims that the company discriminated against a worker during the employment eligibility verification process and then retaliated against her.
When did R.E.E. sign a settlement agreement?
On August 5, 2019, the Division signed a settlement agreement with R.E.E. Inc. d/b/a McDonald’s (“R.E.E.”) resolving charge-based and independent investigations into the company’s employment eligibility verification practices at McDonald’s franchises in the Texas Rio Grande Valley.
When did Quantum Integrators Group settle?
On January 26, 2021, the Division signed a settlement agreement with Quantum Integrators Group to resolve a charge of discrimination in referral for a fee and unfair documentary practices based on citizenship status.